main demands program elections

  • Greetings from 2064


    World puts ad (verkleind).jpg

    I wrote a little futurist story of three pages to explain a new approach in dealing with the main world problems : main tool : international referendum on military reconversion --hope you will find some inspiration--Greetings from Belgium ps I wrote it in Dutch originally, translated it in English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Greek, Turkish, Russian, Chinese, Arab and Portugees.                            War : what to do about it ?  to allow the workers in the arms industry to strike comfortably for worldwide reconversion of the arms industry ... or wait until the world is ruled by a strong left ... and start a telematic world referendum ... or all three at once ... and how and by who ?

    My main page with lots of more blogs on every human interest domain is

    ps We are looking for an IT-er that can make a blog chain voting page on the program demands of the referendum

    Philosophical Resistance Belgium

    A 108 YEARS !

    It seems I became the oldest person in the world last week, 1 of may 2064  What a celebration. No, not like before with a lot of camera teams from all around the globe which would have blocked the mountain road to my Swedish chalet; no, the world is far more organised these days.  Each commune, each city is a member of a worldwide media network.  All people wanting to collaborate with it send the issues not purely related to the local community to a central media location in Stockholm that arranges the further distribution. Compared with the 20st century and the first decennia of the following century the difference in how people run society is enormous. 

    Everyone is connected with one or more projects of the global management system of society. Every project has it sectors.  For a job you can go to Housing, Energy, Food, Telecom, Education, Resources, Environment, Culture, Health, Goods, Distribution, Transport, Safety, Entertainment, Media and Money, Management System. HEFTERECHGDTSEMMM, kind of a Welsh word to mention them all at once. It was some kind of story, taking over the power from the old system.  l will tell you all about it later. Each project has it' s own following up within the project Media.

    The project Global Management System coordinates the 17 projects since the international revolutions around 1924 that put an end to all existing forms of oppression, barbarism and lots of absurd anachronistic situations. Changes were implemented that offered humanity real opportunities to lead more human lives.  The greediness of billionaires and their political and military staff were on the brink of starting a series of nuclear wars.

    Our current management system makes it possible for everyone to do the job you prefer.  We dont need ever growing economies any more to survive financially.  Most of our streets and our intercontinental high ways are connected by a magnetic system of public transport. A computer program calculates the demand of jobs for each project and on the basis of these figures the subscriptions of 14 from the 17 projects are calculated and taken of everyones account ones a month. So no pay in fact for taking the bus. Resources like water, gas, even food became common property, farmers get a decent wage so they arent slaves of bancs any more and even little farmers can restart their production.  In fact the scale and the way food was produced under the old system led to a loss of quality and unhealthy situations for both man and animals.  Private owners of resources are given a wage to work in one of the sectors of the project Resources or they can chose other projects to work in.                    The main criterium of evaluation is not in the first place how much you produce, but how good you feel in your job.

    In the projects Production of Goods and Distribution there isn't a subscription system and the private or cooperative owners of enterprises or shops are bound to follow a worldwide social taxation system where nobody can sheet. Little shop owners have grown in numbers as well and receive a wage for their social function.      Really big producers of goods are obliged to form one group for each kind of product, so there is no more competition.  Closures of factories are a thing of the past , except if there is no more demand for something.

    International, interconnected computer systems calculate the demand an d the price takes into account the wages of people. We could not do away with the system of wages in the areas of production and distribution of goods.  There was to much of a risk that the wealthier classes would turn against the process of restructuration and eventually would pay mercenaries to start social discontent campaigns. We did manage dough to abandon the speculation system and abolish the stock markets but wages and trade and money still exist, be it in an other form. In our education system we stretch a lot of importance to explain that to much consumption can destroy an even ecological production system and the need to move to a system were calculation of prices is no longer needed because people don't take to much of the products.  We know that we can arrange this in a telematic way in which the consumption of each individual or house is followed up, but it' s the attitude of people themselves that is important.  To put it briefly, we only use (digital) money to buy goods and for the rest we have subscriptions on every service. Even if we don't own a house, our rent is taken care of by the management system who pays the house owners a modest rent. That' s why a lot of houses are being sold, so they get cheaper.      The Global Management System provides enough digital money, so that's why there aren't budget cuts any more.

    Military production has ceased to exist, only the police has weapons.  This issue started the revolution in 1924.  People were fed up with the once who governed the world for the sakes of the big bourgeoisie. More and more groups challenged the military industry and the little group of billionaires who in fact owned the two third of the planet. More and more they hated the fact that they had total control over the State apparatus and that they kept the world in poverty and war, while polluting more and more and putting a price on every service and activity possible. The money inn those days more and more went to the banks that wanted to take over social security, pensions, homes and so on. Unemployed people were forced to work for very poor wages or for free, even by the new populist right wing parties claiming to replace the old classical parties.  They just wanted to save the old imperialistic way of thinking by putting the emphasis of political reflection on nationalism, racism you name it. 

    The right to work thus became a joke.  Everyone had different statutes, so divide and rule indeed ruled.           After the first big bank crisis in 2008, especially the most important imperialistic unities in war mongering prepared war after war with lots of unseen destruction and millions of displaced people as a consequence.  Masks fell, budgetary cuts, restrictions and all kind of absurd measures couldn't save the old democracy any more.        Poverty and war and the need to get as wealthy as in Western countries led millions to flew their countries of origin.  The bourgeoisie was even pleased about this development, they could use cheap labour and a division between people, leading to a strengthening of their right wing parties. War mongering layers of industry and goverment in the Western and Arab world preferred negotiating with right wing politicians to extend their greed more and more.

    And what about the left ? The left restricted itself to defensive tactics within the almost purely old capitalist system.  They did not take into account the how's and why's of all kind of subjective characteristics of people, of things that held them of from revolting.Religious people thinking that the left was for State Capitalism or 'atheistic'. The left did not have clear philosophical and political answers on these themes and no really alternative to propagate as managing society in a different way was concerned.  Parts of the population still taught capitalism was to rule for ever and they enjoyed the benefits of it, not seeing the dangers and the sand the 'building' was build on.

    A lot of groups were occupied with only partly solutions, nobody offered a global alternative. People in power were not afraid of manifestations.  Wars could have been prevented by class action, but that did not emerge.             The number of people with a social conscience and enough consciousness had to grow and grew, so that in the end they wanted to look for ways to stop wars and poverty and social security being attacked. In the end they organised in local and later international groups that wanted an international binding world referendum about the most urgent problems facing humanity.



    I could convince some of them to join their force in an organisation called CONSCIENCE. The English short word for 'Collective Organisation for New Simultaneous Cooperative International program & project Elections, Necessary to Create more Equality'.  Not bad for a Dutch Belgian hee !

    We wanted to get more and more people using their free time to involve in all those social and political matters and free time they more and more had, being thrown out of their jobs by automatization and so on.                They abandoned their habits of before, to much gaming, not enough reading good books and they didn't like their living conditions any more. As their numbers grew the political establishment started giving in to their demands mainly because the really leftist parties started taking bits of their programs too.  More and more people, even the not politically evolved as well started believing in a kind of democracy where first the global program was chosen and then in a second round the conductors, directly on the project lists.

    Once this idea grew still more popular the bourgeois parties tried to save the old system by forming government of national unity, promising that those would hold referenda themselves to deal with the demands of the revolutionaries.  But it was to late.  The idea of creating another system of elections had become to popular.         If people could choose the winner of the Euro song contest why wouldn't they have their say on war and social issues ? The referendum of CONSCIENCE had such a success that in the end it lead to an international conference of disarmament and the reconversion of the military industry.  The workers in those industries started making plans to make goods the people in poor countries really needed.  The leftist parties took the ideas to establish a new way in managing society over and won more worldwide elections with them from 1924 onwards, even before the new system was implemented officially. That's how the fundaments for our today's world in 2064 were made.

    Lees meer...

  • Politieke minimumeisen Political demands


    Dutch texts see below :

    Through evolution animals developed skills to survive scarcity. No need for the human race to be hostile to each other. There is enough of everything.

    Acording to Oxfam recent a small group of people own nearly half of all the wealth on earth. Different political parties ty to keep that too rich group in power and to continue military production in billions of euros or dollars. Those weapons make it  to war zones, wars which are a continuation of economic struggle for raw materials, markets and strategic positions. Multinationals decide who can and cannot have a decent job. The ‘Right to work’ does not exist and the word "freedom" is used by many as freedom of production and trade and speculation. The environment, income equality and safety, everything must give way to the biggest capitalists. In their race to be the cheapest producers on the market they try to destroy the achievements of social security and their political administration don’  make international agreements on equal pay for equal work worldwide or an equitable global connected telematics tax system or simple standardized social security systems. There is an enormous amount of often fragmented backlash against all those negative excesses of the 'first profits than people’ thought ". Farmers unite from local to international, and try to produce their products not only themselves healthier, but also they try to distribute them without the suffocating influence of supermarkets politics. Workers whose businesses are closed while there are still profits there are examples enough.       The fight for good redundancy schemes should be reviewed again and this issue affects not only the production of goods or the distribution but increasingly also services ... banks convinced their customers to manage their own and they put their workers out of a job…which is going to be the future more and more  for broad sectors of employment. A halt must be called out to the reduction of public employment and the outsourcing of collection services, transportation, telecom, refugee relief, even babysitting and much more. In sickness and elderly care private groups already make lots of money.  In many areas resistance is needed. We are not against the abolition of work…but everyone should have a good income…but the current system cannot pride this.  Al ot of resistance is needed. Hunger and war  have put large flows of refugees on the move. The most selfish spectrum of the right wing in politics who caused the wars by participating with other imperialist countries blame the weakest and they ‘own’ people, using cheaper labor and using foreigners as scapegoats for everything one has come short here. The major media launch a number of topics daily, even in social media, based on half-truths, lies, details ... all to keep the working population dealing with the two things that really count : work or a good replacement income.

    Dieren, de ene meer dan de andere, hebben prachtige methoden om te overleven, zich te beschermen of anderen tot prooi te maken.    Een katvis, een octopusachtige, heeft een enorm speciale huid met pigmenten die je in het oog terugvindt, via zijn spierwerking kan hij zelfs een 3Deffect met zijn huid insinueren en zijn miljoenen kleurenpigmenten kleuren en vormen doen aannemen die bij de omgeving kunst om onopvallend te zijn, hem op het lijf geschreven. In welke mate heeft een mens een aantal fysiek-psychologische trucen om ook niet op te vallen, anderen te veroveren, te domineren en zo verder ?‎  Welke is de evolutionaire oorzaak van dit gedrag ?  Schaarste zal zoals in de geschiedenis van de mensheid wel een rol hebben gespeeld. En nog. Wat de  mens betreft, er is geen reden om in competitie met anderen aan het bestaan deel te nemen, want er is genoeg voor iedereen. Er is volgens onder meer de recente cijfers van Oxfam een kleine groep mensen die bijna de helft van alle in geld uitgedrukte rijkdom op aarde bezitten.  Dat betekent in de praktijk dat de in verschillende partijen voor rekening van deze kleine groep werkende politici er voor zorgen dat op verschillende gebieden in de sociaal-politieke wereldsituatie een status-quo behouden blijft.  De militaire productie wordt in biljoenen euro of dollar of… en zo verder uitgedrukt, er wordt enorm veel mee verdiend en er wordt aan oorlogszones geleverd, oorlogen die een vervolg zijn van economische strijd om grondstoffen, markten en strategische posities.  Dat wil ook zeggen dat het voor een heel groot stuk de multinationals zijn die beslissen wie wel en niet mag meewerken om een dergelijke creatie van rijkdom mogelijk te maken en wie niet.  Recht op werk bestaat immers niet en het woord ‘vrijheid’ wordt door velen gebruikt als vrijheid van produceren en handel drijven en speculeren, zodanig dat de concentratie van het merendeel van de opbrengsten bij een beperkte elitaire groep komt te liggen.  Het milieu, de inkomensgelijkheid en de veiligheid, alles moet wijken voor de grootste kapitalisten. In hun race om de goedkoopste op de markt te zijn sneuvelen ook de verworvenheden van de sociale zekerheid en komt men er niet toe van internationale afspraken te maken rond gelijke lonen voor gelijk werk wereldwijd of een rechtvaardig wereldwijd verbonden telematisch taxatiesysteem of eenvoudige gestandaardiseerde sociale zekerheidssystemen.  Er is enorm veel vaak versnipperde tegenreactie tegen al die negatieve uitwassen van de ‘eerst de winsten, dan de mensen gedachte’ (in plaats van omgekeerd). Boeren verenigen zich van lokaal tot internationaal en proberen hun producten niet alleen zelf gezonder te produceren, maar ook te verdelen zonder de voor hen verstikkende invloed van de grootwarenhuizen politiek.  Werknemers wiens bedrijven gesloten worden terwijl er nog winst genoeg gemaakt wordt, voorbeelden genoeg…de strijd voor goede afvloeiingsregelingen moet als tactiek wel eens herbekeken worden en deze problematiek treft niet alleen de goederenproductie of de distributie maar meer en meer ook de dienstverlening…de banken mikken op de klanten om hun eigen te beheren en hebben meer en meer bijna geen personeel meer vandoen, wat voor brede sectoren van werkgelegenheid meer en meer het geval gaat zijn naar de toekomst toe. Een halt moet ook toegeroepen worden aan de afbouw van de openbare werkgelegenheid en het uitbesteden aan kapitaalgroepen van ophaaldiensten, transport, telecom, vluchtelingenopvang, ja zelfs kinderopvang en veel meer. In de ziektezorg en bejaardenopvang is door privégroepen al veel van de zorgend die de gemeenschap verstrekte in bezit genomen, met meer en meer onbetaalbare tarieven tot gevolg.  Weerwerk dient ook geboden aan de gevolgen van de verrotting van heel dat grote geldsysteem, met name, de enorme hongergebieden en oorlogen die grote vluchtelingenstromen in beweging hebben gezet. Het meest egoïstische spectrum van de rechterzijde in de politiek gebruikt de aanslagen in de meer welvarende wereld om een rechtse politiek tegen de eigen bevolking te voeren, gebruik makend van goedkopere werkkrachten en de vreemdeling als zwarte schaap gebruiken voor alles wat men hier moet derven en wat er misloopt. De grote media maken er een kunst van om ook via een deel van sociale media dagelijks een aantal onderwerpen te lanceren, gebaseerd op halve waarheden, leugen, details…allemaal om de werkende bevolking af te houden van te ijveren voor de twee zaken die echt tellen : werk of een goed vervangingsinkomen. wat voorafging :