Divide and Rule-40 modern bourgeois concepts
Say “everyone is equal”, act otherwise
Give some workers early pension, others not
Pay allowances according to degrees
Divide people in too the language they speak
Let private shareholders run public services
Broadcast parties that support the division game
Subside religions that keep people away from spirituality
Organize elections : first the politicians, then the program
Divide people by organizing unjust taxes
Keep social security overcomplex
Show horror images and do not explain the truth
Get a lot of immigrants in too the country to divide people
Don’t support cheap rents or social house building
Translate being liberal in too the law of the richest groups
Don’t give the impression that decent laws could better the world
Don’t let the 99% get the idea that they could take power by telematics
…or by organizing elections on an international program themselves
…and then choose the conductors
Surround yourself with people with connections to the bourgeoisie
Make sure a lot of people stay poor
Pay workers very different according to country and sector
Speculate with wages, prices, resources
Regroup and then make price monopolies
Report a lot on right wing manifestations, give the impression they were many
Control the bourgeois journalists and don’t talk about alternative media
Try to blame progressive regimes for a lot
Create a feeling of insecurity
Don’t care about the rights of animals
Give pharma industry and others benefits and save bankers
Don’t let farmers just be farmers producing healthy things
Control the kind of history that is being thought
Support the entertainment industry and culture that keeps uncritical
Use terrorist groups for the purposes of imperialism
Don’t let ethics bother you, (embryos cannot take revenge?)
Let capitalism put it’ s greedy hands on health insurance and other stuff
Find ways in convincing people that paying 5% for a loan is normal…
And O % as a rent for placing your money is not
Make sure that people believe to have is more important than to be…
And keep them working like fools, producing a lot of silly products
Moral of this story :
don’t be jealous of what your working class members gained,
the purpose their intention is to keep us divided
see also totality of my work, partly in English via :
totaalwerk blogfilosoof :
TEGEN WERKLOOSHEI D OORLOG UITBUITING this post, this time with better spelling
LESSEN UIT DE GESCHIEDENIS LESSONS FROM HISTORY
Why don't we put forward our own program first ?
Why don't we defend our own alternative in the enterprises we work ?
Why don't we invite the jobless to join our reunions ?
Why don't we develop our new strategy to put our demands in power ?
B . LESSONS FROM HISTORY
Can lessons from class-struggle become determinant ?
Words must be used properly,otherwise you get unnecessary misunderstandings. For example 'communism' is a system that is based on the collective ownership of the means of production a distribution ,in function of the most simple administration and without a salary system or commodity-production(no prices, no pay), a system that replaces the conditions under which we work under capitalism ore state-capitalism. Such a system didn't ever exist (or in a primitive way maybe). Attempts to establish such a system have always been answered with arms or with technical and sabotage from groups who were afraid of losing their benefits. And what is 'socialism' then ? Is it a phase between capitalism and communism ? A certain degree of 'nationalised' economic property still based on salary and commodity production, with more serious prices for the goods?
What do they mean by improving 'democracy'? Democracy means "the power of the people". Under 'people' you can understand as well the aristocracy(nobles), the bourgeoisie (the little group of enormously wealthy owners of big companies, banks… .) as well as the 'petit-bourgeoisie(owners of little firms, State leaders, important .functions…)or even the small independent or the workers and farmers…if you understand this under 'people' then maybe you think it's normal that political power is divided between political parties and the very well paid Congres and coalition governments. That's one way of putting it…but how about social and economic equality ?
Residents are not 'citizens' . 'Citizens' replaced the ruling aristocracies, thanks to the hunger-uprisings of the poor, who were not organised politically yet. If you understand with 'people', the ones having to sell their labour or the small independents struggling with monopoly-capitalism, then you are a proletarian and capitalism made you the strongest, (that is only in numbers) Who has the majority can rule. Why is there then so much social misery, war, exploitation ? Do collectivist want this then…or can we do without the devastating way capitalism tries to be progressive in ?
Why is capitalism socially a demoded system ?
What is the difference between 'bourgeois' and 'collectivist' democracy ? How should the last one be organised ?
Is it still a useful tactic for collectivists to participate in elections ? Do the classical bourgeois parties represent the interests of the workers you think ? Aren't fascism and bourgeois democracy just two complementary forms of ruling of the money-elite over the workers ? In which way also bourgeoisie can stay in power by using the analyses and programs of parties claiming to be workers-parties ? Can workers continue to struggle without a blueprint of their society in mind ? What do workers still understand from the lessons of the past and why are they trapped in the old bourgeois and proletarian way of thinking about history ?
How to do away with corporatism and develop solidarity and how can a new proletarian culture replace the money guided circus our society is ? How to develop our consciousness about all this in daily life ? Is working like slaves for anonymous shareholders est ,or hunger, or underdevelopment where the old system has no other answer to then war and further exploitation ?
Because words were and are so misused , let's call us collectivists and not base us entirelly on one figure in proletarian history( for a collectivist alternative, read : http://philosophicalresistace4.skynetblogs.be
or mail to philosophicalresistance&gmail.com
After reading this you will notice that a lot of arguments and discussions will lose their sense or get a solution :which ?: the 'one' ore the 'more party system'/substitution (the party rules instead of the soviets)/enterism (working as a little group, penetrating in other parties…to take over/ self managment (within the capitalistic .system/nationalisations/state-capitalism or not/alliances with national bourgeoisie or not/federalism-self independence/syndicalism/ participation in elections/…
By managing society under non-capitalistic conditions the collectivist democracy can develop through the projects.
Collectivists who are in for this kind of revolution are getting tired of arguing about the mistakes of their great examples (this can be very interesting) but why is capitalism after so much time, still in power, still the ruling ideology ?
The history of working class looks like a war-saga, with different parties trying to take power, who succeed and then become attacked by capitalism or it's collaborators in the very own proletarian circles. Most revolutionaries think that the alternative for power will emerge from the spontaneously to emerge councils, or from 'democratic centralism' in a proletarian vanguard-party. Realistically it cannot be otherwise or those traditionally wished 'councils' or central committees of the vanguard-parties will contain such differences in opinions and will be so infiltrated, that the mass of workers will not be able to orientate themselves : not anymore on the corporatist demands of the State allied trade unions, not anymore on the left bourgeois-parties or not on those expecting miracles from the 'democratic' debate in the councils. Without alternative goals and a revolutionary workers-consciousness which stop ownership of the big business and the right to decide on financial issues as a non-worker, we will get nowhere, we will not know what to do.
Without managers and control commissions in the factories and companies, without local and internationally organised political leaders and clean deals…we will obtain no control.
Almost all strikes and initiatives collapse without global alternative. Revolutionaries these days put their hope on the collapse of capitalism, on a purely 'asking for more money' or less time to work, without seeing capitalisms real condition the last hundred years. Capitalism has tied workers in a hundred ways, why shouldn't workers put forward their maximum demands ? We are the youngest class in history…can we take power while letting capitalism survive ?
When will 'the last ones' finally become 'the first ones'?
Each group in proletarian history has had it's benifits and mistakes that were bound to happen because of the circumstances of time and space, bureaucracy, privileges…
The utopian tried it on a small scale. Marx and Engels showed that living conditions and not so much great personalities make history and got in the clinch with people like Bakoenin who saw revolution rather more as an immediate coup, who could not be led by a mass party, but by a group of maybe hundred revolutionaries, spread over Europe, infiltrating everywhere, to take over the' rule from as well the bourgeois organisations as the International Workers Association and put it in the hands of his Alliance.(he did not succeed) Seventeen years after the end of the International Workers Association The mass parties that grew under the rise of social .democracy established the Socialist International (second 1889)
In 1914 when the great majority of German Social Democratic approved the funds to fight the war , communists left it to establish the third int.
The councils who for the first time in history emerged on the scene , got a second change in 1917. The Bolshevik helped to fight the councils theoretically and practically against the old parliamentary and aristocratic influences. After the revolution 14 foreign armies attacked the young Russian republic which had to be built again from practically zero. In Germany after world war one ,a revolution which was ended by the military forces with the aid of social democrats 'showing themselves as revolutionaries' paved the way for the success of a big noise with a little moustache . Despite the electoral success of the Kommunist Partei Deutschland, KAPD,…the skinny painter supported by the bourgeoisie would win, because he got the money to create a bit of jobs by means of state-capitalism (arms production, roads…)to gain support. Few people understood that capitalism needed war to survive. In the mean while a Georgian fellow lead a big heavy industrialisation process which helped to beat nazism.
He lead a party that was much based on bureaucratic and strategical deals with the fully capitalist countries and stopped the process in the councils. Necessary from a military viewpoint or not in those days…to many wanted a more-party system for their own reasons, that's for sure !?
Ownership became less private ,but the production relations did not alter (still salaries, commodities) so it was not really a system you could call 'communist'…it was a social experiment under terrible conditions; an economy of trying to survive, while the world got on fire once more. The experiment couldn't compete with the purely capitalist states who had accumulated money to start again once more thanks to war-benefits, and the urss degenerated in the direction of revisionism ( reconciliation of capitalists and reformists) As a consequence : the economy of a part of the east, became a hunting ground again for western capitalism.
Next time some viewpoints of different vanguard-parties, which illustrate all this.
As it comes to butchering working class, all States know how to divide the work between them . We saw it in Spain in the civil war, in Italy some years later… Very 'honourable'? men like Churchill for example commanded the bombing of Dresden, a town with no strategical value…but filled with deserters and revolutionary workers at the time… and who ordered to drop some atomic bombs when Japan was already defeated?
In imperialist wars, workers SHOULD not choose the side of one of the fighting states, they make revolution in their own country, OR should not listen if they are told to disarm (like in Italy-strikes of 1943- where once again like in Spain, communists would join a 'government of national unity' that obeyed the currents who saved capitalism)Were these results the maximum that was possible those days ?
They would next time better listen to the left part of those claiming to represent them…and who know that 'Stalinists' as well as 'Trotsky' as others made -'mistakes'-(but was really possible under those circumstances ?)
where they are trying to learn from.
Maybe collectivists can discover a way of avoiding civil war when they work out new tactics of preventing imperialist war ... and changing society more peacefully.
Some s u b j e c t i v e problems
Promoting consciousness remains a difficult task in these days, but as Marx explained, the objective situation is on our side… the most difficult part remain the subjective living conditions that determine our ideological links with the ruling class. To this we can also add the emotional, and living conditions or the bourgeois that claim a monopoly on 'spiritual-live'…as if materialists do not have a vision on this…an eternal one…as eternal as the life of the electrons out of which everything that exists exists. The media then…another obstacle :can we find a way in which on a large scale we can promote the idea that we are being told a lot of lies and rubbish ?
Not all is against us dough. In my spare time I visited let's say about 25000 political homepages on the net .
The left is far more better represented then the right. Very easily (one recognises the crab from the titles of the pages) I found about a 1000 groups or individuals who took my attention and I mailed about 400 of them, getting some 200 mails or visits of the collectivist homepage back)
Let's hope more and more young people or older, unemployed or not will start digging into their collectivist past and discover that they hold the key to the future of a better world. Let's hope afterwards they start thinking about uniting to discuss what can be done. Let's hope their numbers will have grown on the decisive moments. Let's hope the old rulers won't be able to let us go and fight the workers of other countries no more…in the mean time they manage to do this on an economical level…we even fight the workers on our own factory floor, …some of us are put in anger because they haven't got jobs and others do…another easy victory for capitalism. Every fight against our family, friends or lover(s) is energy that cannot be used against our real exploiters… so find your inner calm and resolve your relation problems in a human way : try to become emotional strong, because we have a whole new kind of other world to win…a world in which we will be able to discover the never ending story of your consciousness that tries to enrichen itself before the 'corpus', this 'germ' dies and leaves its fruits… Start observing your world today with other eyes and find out how it works, intervene, come up for the rights of your class, don't capitulate, find out when best to retreat, or which is a good tactic. Share your impressions. Educate yourselves and others. Think before you speak, when you get carried away by your blood. Do not lose your sense of humour, it will help you to learn how to be patient…every process takes it' s own time, when you are ahead , you know this can sometimes be a handicap to you as well as a privilege.
Learn how to counter statements your fellowmen read or heard in the bourgeois controlled media.
Learn to talk in public. If you are afraid to act, those thoughts will grow and you will even be more afraid afterwards.
Overcome your inner barriers, discover the undiscovered part of yourself. Live is more than acting and thinking as robots.
Live was not meant to be lived as to much of us live it today.
If we do not improve certain situations things will get worse for us all. For those without seeing the problems : more States poses atomic bombs; each day unemployment and war dominate the news, increasing exploitation tries to save capitalism but problems are getting bigger. Please start thinking and acting.
Read also the following articles :OPAA : Octo's Politcal Analyses & Alternatives
+++THE IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPING AN IDEOLOGICAL METHOD
+++MATURITY COULD CHANGE THE WORLD
+++REVOLUTIONS SO FAR WERE OF A REFORMIST NATURE
+++A CHANGE IN ATTITUDE
+++LES RELATIONS HUMAINES OBJECTIVES
+++PROLETARIAN ADMINISTRATIAN AND HIERARCHY VERSUS BOURGEOIS STATE AND BOURGEOIS DEMOCRACY
+++LA LUTTE FINALE SE PREPARE CHAQUE JOUR
OPAA : Octo's Politcal Analyses & Alternatives
+++THE IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPING AN IDEOLOGICAL METHOD
An ideology is a way to understand life and it's different practical an theoretical meanings. Consciousness is born each time practical experiences ead to theoretical tinking and result in orientating and acting in an adapted way. Political history gives us much examples of this. Sometimes only reforms are possible. Sometimes revolutionary reforms are being pushed by circumstances... a real revolution shall become possible when the global picture of circumstances is understood by a more interdisciplinary and worldwide orientated consciousness. The same laws that guide history also can be found in our own emotional and intellectual development and even in some relationships we encounter.
Consciousness is born out of matter, like theory is born out of practice.
If theories are not based on practice, we call them fantasies, which can be nice or dangerous or both. We call this 'idealism', it leads to confusion because it's no longer 'materialism'. Sometimes illusions are necessary to get back on the road of reality. Both in social as in personal life.
The theoretical way to understand life, is studying all the existing rational, objective sciences and combining them with the more subjective sciences and inject the result into practical life. The subjective science depend on the objective ones because without 'matter' there can be no consciousness. At the same time the hierarchical weight of the subjective prevents the objective laws to impose them self on the general evolution of society and the human being...but this is always a temporary process. An ideology is a way to understand both the history and present stage of the world and its consequences on global living conditions.
However great some existing differences in exploitation might be, capitalist ideology also tends to evolve in the direction of socialist ideology...because the foundation for a world economy and the way to manage it by modern technical means, still increase...this shall be an advantage once proletarians shall reunite in an effective and revolutionary way. And they shall, because the capitalistic inner contradictions that scientific socialism pointed out, still seem to remain unsolvable. But nobody holds a crystal ball, so let's not insult each other if we have different opions on the economic strength of capitalism.
Important to remember is that a decreasing economy leads to a weakening of the ideology of the ruling class...at least if the oppressed class is not beaten physically or brought to poverty...or has to little class consciousness left. The first task of the most conscious human beings with an orientation towards proletarian ideology, must be to understand these process of evolution. Ones they do, they must present a global and general program of managing society and experiencing life in a different way. Theoretical explanations should correspond with the practical conditions they try to explain...but they should try to always be one step ahead.
Feodal ideology, with the aristocracy as it' s ruling class, based it's power on an unclear concept of 'God',(and not on the eternal forces of nature who produced and developed consciousness) and mainly on the ownership of land and consequently economic and military power.
While all kind of historical facts happened according to changing living conditions and while the bourgeois rulers of the capitalist system used the proletarian discontent to take power from the nobles, they started developing the means of production and the production forces. The world was (and still is) forged and forced together in a very unethical way : wars, famine, unemployment, ecologic disasters, exploitation).
Capitalist ideology based it's power mainly on the private ownership of the means of production, on the production of commodities, trade and a wage system...while in theory the really socialist thinkers of the last 150 years wanted to abolish these bourgeois-based things; in practice they had to be satisfied with all kind of economic, social ande political reforms that nowadays lead to a degree of wealth for only a limited number of workers. While in theory the socialist thinkers wanted communism, they saw State-Capitalism being established; while they wanted to abolish the State, they saw it being transformed in a strengthened apparatus in function of bourgeois ideology.
While they looked for unity amongst proletarians, they got divided on theoretical and practical or even personal bases. While reformism helped survive capitalism and the final technical revolution is now taking place and the world becomes more and more a global private company...it SEEMS bourgeois ideology overcame it's inner contradictions.
Suppose the capitalist system manages to create one world market and one company or a high standard of living for the whole planet, shall it then have overcome it's contradictions ? No, because exploitation and surplusvalue shall continue to lead to overproduction. So why capitalism continues to dominate ? Because we continue to accept their ideology. Because our weaknes, capitalism can continue it's often historical task in an often bloody way. They still have the economil and military power to do so.
While every different group of scientific socialists has it' s own calculations on the economical fitness of the current ruling system, no real alternative way of managing society is being put forward. While the bourgeois class and it's managers and politicians continue to invent more organisation in function of keeping in power; the majority of social or political 'workers'-organisations, limit themselves mainly to the small and limited economical battles. While the little 'gains' of this struggle within the borders of the system try to maintain the different living standards of the different groups of modern proletarians...no organised group of workers not even claims an equal income for everybody in its program...and no group explains how a society without a wage system and commodity production can produce and distribute in a more or less equal way. Are we afaid to use our imagination ? Do we need the hierarchical discipline and structures of our current economic, social and political rulers ? Are we, the millions who lead the practical day to day live that state, company and family offer us, so brainwashed that we keep on walking in the mill that the bourgeois-media keeps turning for us ?
How can we learn to get more assertive in a proletarian way ?
By taking an intrest in phylosophy, politics, history... By studying our own concrete living conditions where we work and live. By realising that the emotional and psychologic problems we are all confronted with (whether in ourselves or in all our different kinds of relations), are getting worse by the current system of production. That's where real ideology is all about, it's really a kind of spiritual matter that has nothing to do with the classical ideology of 'religion' seen in a conservative way, but with combining and connecting all the different kinds of consciousness we came to mention in this text and others. Human beings can get a lot of energy from being conscious about these kind of things...or it can make them sick, because they realise they cannot change the world on their own : 'workers unite'.
+++MATURITY COUD CHANGE THE WORLD
As I explain in the text 'a change in attitude', there are a lot of problems facing our social and economic lives. I already explained a lot of political problems and put forward some solutions for those rather objective areas of life. If you want, I could compare these explanations and solutions once again with those of other individuals or groups or PARTies...but I'm not going to do this in this text. Every explanation or solution is PART of the way things evoluate in the course of the real future of mankind that is to be expected. Each view and alternative, whether based on an existing reformistic power or on the possible revolutionary challenges; reflects a certain degree of consciousness, based on material positions in society, as well as on the degree of subjective consciousness we've reached : for those who do not understand, I'm talking about less measurable things like solidarity, emotional, psychological ...even spiritual consciousness.
Solidarity is the collective as well as individual emotion we need to do our share of the work or our collective, again individual capacity to react and organise in favour of groups of people under threat of unemployment, war, famine, disaster... . We still are dominated by the kind of ideology that says we should think as individuals, reacting only on our individual interests. That's why unions still are so corporatist and why big strikes for more general demands or manifestations against wars...still have so little impact. That's why a lot of us need things like money and being exploited as a stimulus to make us do any work at all. That's why absolute hierarchical organisation is still more effective then freely agreed and spontaneous arangements.
+++REVOLUTIONS SO FAR WERE OF A REFORMIST NATURE
In the former century, the 1917-revolution, in what was the beginning of the former Sovjet Union, took the country from a backward capitalist and semi feudal country on the road to a state-capitalistic economy. The different groups that were the main players leading the developments and changes that farmers and workers or other classes demanded, were already active in other countries like Germany...(mainly social-democrats) and they would have splits, ends and regroups upon till today. In the last years of tsarism one could find ones political inspiration in groups like the cades, the social-revolutionaries, the Bolshevik, Anarchists... .
Today, some workers groups claim that capitalism was already decadent at the beginning of the century. In a moral way this is indeed very true. But in an economical way; that is in relation to the technological progress to be made and the production forces that were to be developed, this is not an entirely deepened pointed of view. Since the military and bureaucratic State power proved to be stronger then the revolts and organisation of the workers, they did not get the opportunity to prove that they could organise and develop the economy as 'disciplined' as the bourgeois State and companies could. After each revolution (that was in fact a 'revolt'), followed a counter-revolt...ending between the first and second world war in fascism...as a kind of Super State capitalism. Were the minds already prepared to do away with the wage system and the production of commodities (commerce) in those days ?
Since the consciousness of each social class traduces itself in different degrees of consciousness; there were a lot of different kinds of proletarian parties confronting established parties that were supposed to represent workers. Unity seemed to be and still is impossible on the basis of party dogma's. No unified program to present the workers had any success It could not have been otherwise, because the result of some
evolutions on a certain point in time and place cannot be other than the product of the material and ideological conditions people life under.
One cannot expect of people having to work 12 hours a day, and having little welfare, that they take an intrest in reading about revolution in an academic way. In our times the bourgeois-system tries to poison our minds with the values of their ideological (often idiotical) way of life...so we would stay as atomised as they would like us to be and to prevent that we get conscious of the fact that in reality we merely are the tools they are using. The way we lead our lives is the way they want us to lead our lives. We are beiing kept conditioned for their aims.
Should we wait for their economy to collapse once more in an unbearable way or should we wait for the moment when the new magical mystery toy of globalism meets massive resistance...or for the moment when people get fed up of stressed working and living conditions...and rise in an organised why against this all ? Should we wait until some people do not cling as much to their luxe anymore and become active ?
We, the ones knowing about the theoretical history, think too much only in terms of whether one is a Leninist, Trotskist, Stalinist...or another 'ist' with a family name before it. How are we going to intervene in the process of workers eventually wanting to take power ? Now that we have elaborated our theories and each variety of ideas exist, how are we going to regroup ? Points of view can be different and we must keep on writing good articels, but we should be very prudent.
One should be as realistic to recognize the fact that for example China today is a more modern State then it was in 1927, because the Chinese CP-policy, in spite of it 's numerous mistakes or alliances with the forces of the right at that time, contributed to that proces.
One should be able to say, without being insulted that some benefits ; acquired under the former social experiments in the former USSR or the DDR, were better than the daily live an increasingly part of their populations have now anno 2001 . Without being distrusted, one should be able to say that in times of war , the 'revolutionary theory of ‘defaitism' (the war against each nation's own establishment) was more easy to put into practice in the days of the Russian Tsarism then in fascist occupied Europe.
After all our studying and writing we should become able to put forward our own program to be voted on one day. Afterwards the ones to control such a program could be appointed by international elections also...no elections where voters can vote on 'parties', but international elections on PROJECTS. We have already a lot of concrete propositions on this...maybe you have also. Why wait untill workers liberate themselves on their own and start leadin 'councils' 'democratically'. Will then the majority be , as by a happy coincidence; the most 'conscious' part of the proletariat ? I'm afraid not. I'm not a supporter of certain 'chaos-theories'. Intervening in the class-struggle theoretically is one thing, guiding it in a practical way is another...leading in periods of struggle will prove to be necessary... . But what will we then have to offer ?
+++WORKERS ADMINISTRATIAN AND HIERARCHY VERSUS BOURGEOIS STATE AND BOURGEOIS DEMOCRACY
Following a number of discussions going on on the internet and outside it, it seems to me a lot of controversy exists on the question of how a socialist project is to replace the system of exploitation and concurrency.
Every group and all the not-organised individuals have their own ideas on this subject and the way alternatives are to be implemented.
If such a system is to establish itself and wishes to survive, it cannot do without strictly defining the notion 'proletarian hierarchy'.
According to me, proletarian dictatorship is not the rule of a party or the rule of the 'democratic centralism' of councils; or not a coalition between parties; but the coordinated action of the 'highest EXECUTIVE council of the internationally organised 'projects' (1 political legislative project called 'society' and 14 practical projects to manage society on a world base).
In a period of revolutionary struggles, l 'councils' must come together to debate and decide on a transition program towards an non-capitalist society. To prepare this kind of situation we could already form, and in fact are forming embryonal committees.
Once an agreement on the demands for each project is reached, their international executive organ can organise international elections for or against such a transitional program.
Since that program will be mainly based on the needs of proletarians, such a program shall have a large majority. After the aproval of the program, the councils can organise international elections on a non-party base.
To appoint the presidents of each project in society, people would be able to give their votes for candidates arranged in one of the 15 projects necessary to manage society. Leaders must follow the guidelines of the projects and can be replaced if they don't follow the program, or if they prove to be not ready to manage whatever is to be managed.
In this way the State, as an instrument in keeping capitalism in power, can be replaced by a proletarian hierarchy, capable of providing a real socialist alternative and a mode of functioning for the transition towards socialism ...which becomes more needed as years go by.
The 15 projects , needed to manage society in a modern, technocratic way, are : one legislative project, 14 executive projects, all having delegates in the legislative project)
-SOCIETY-project (legislative and justice matters : proletarian members from the councils can be candidate. There can be a delegation from consumer)organisations as well. The project 'society' will have to debate on the demands for each project.
A temporary proposition and an exemple of this can be found on the homepage http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/9799
The main, unanswered question is : 'can we go directly from a wage-based society towards a wage-less form of organising society ' ? Objectively we are ready for this; capitalism and we, the workers, have developed the material conditions for it, but are we ready for such a change, 'subjectively' ? We should put up an educational campaign on it...on all the aspects it includes.
The role of 'money' in a new non-speculative society, based on purely administrating production and distribution or public services in a first stage; could be reduced to buying food and consumer-goods (their prices based on worldwide standardised production conditions).
The cost of Public Services could be organised as subscriptions taken from our wage before you get it.
A lot shall depend on what will happen to class-consciousness in its confrontation with the living-conditions to be expected under a further rule of capitalism (objective factors) A lot shall depend also on our ability to organise an the amount of objection within workers themselves.
If State reformism can keep capitalism going in times of depression, and an important number of proletarians, or independents whose living conditions are effected in a negative way, will resist the proletarians that choose to organise in councils; then all kinds of proletarian propositions must avoid the civil war the bourgeois parts of society will eventually seek.
The executive projects for managing society can be arranged as : work/food/housing/energy/telematics/transport/environment/production/
I hope you understood this explanation. I know that different kinds of socialists are trying each to reach their goals in separated ways, basing themselves on different analyses of history. But do we not share the same goals and should we not learn to work together on a realistic an practical base, not just an academic one ?
Weather you have but your believes in reaching the socialist transformation of society by means of bourgeois-democratic elections for propaganda-purposes or whether you are organising on another base; our class needs a program and an alternative way to organise and manage society. In the mean while we (in general) still get the politicians we 'deserve', because of our low degree of resistance and because of the fact we still cling to bourgeois ideology , whether politically or emotionally.
+++A CHANGE IN ATTITUDE
I wonder what military stratigists are already planning for the future.
Most of the modern developed countries can rely on professional troops.
Since they abolished the 'civil' military duty for young men, they fight their wars from the air. They know that a massive reaction against their wars is not evident in these times where their media prepares the minds months before they attack. 'Humanitarian' Interventions' for situations they helped to create themselves.
They put Sadam in power. They armed the 'religious' lunatics in Afghanistan. They pushed nationalism in the East. They control the political scene in the middle East and in Africa. They gained and still gain big money producing weapons. They supported one ethnic group against another.
What are their plans. Will they 'intervene' in Russia once the process of every kind of des integration shall accelerate and shall threaten their newly found 'colony' ? They surely continue to destabilize their economical competitors like China, using the trick of 'bourgeois democracy' again; or the 'red danger'.
They and all the ones that serve their system that fools us day in day out. They project their images of being rich and wealthy into our minds and oblige us to go and work to purchase a happy life, matching up to their standards. They put in the minds of millions that 'one exists more if one can buy more' They make us believe that working like robots adds to our personal development. They convinced us that producing goods is only possible if huge profits can be made. With the help of 'our' unions they teach us that lay-offs are indispensable to 'survive' .
They try to make some of their statements as the most natural order of things; so that is why they dare defend the use of cheap medicaments against Aids in South Africa for example. They pay their super managers and our football players millions a year. Their States keep us well divided, according to our 'place' in the system. But still they keep saying we are all so equal.
Why do we KEEP PUTTING UP with this ? We vote, they stay in power, 'liberalising the world' more and more. State-related jobs keep some of us in a sort of obedience, the ones who oppose themselves put themselves out of a job, just like in private enterprises. We work, they live their lives on the profits we make. We keep on accepting their kind of hierarchy instead of inventing and imposing our own. Their system stays in place because of it 's hierarchical cohesion. Some of us believe that a system of their own can do without hierarchy; but even equality cannot function without it. The political hierarchy we must work towards to, must
be a hierarchy that is based upon the presidents of an economic and social program. If one day council all around the world shall organise elections, we should be able to first say yes to a global revolutionary program and then elect the ones guiding the different projects of society. The ones delegated by the world council and the ones internationally elected on the lists of the projects should be accepted as the highest hierarchy.
Whenever there are indications that someone doesn't realize his tasks, according to what he or she was put in charge for, a majority of workers in a company , a project or council, could ask for that persons removal.
C.O.N.S.C.I.E.N.C.E. , the Committee for New Simultaneous International Elections ,Necessary to Create more Equality
PROPOSES YOU TO VOTE ON
A COLLECTIVE ALTERNATIVE ____________________________________________________
PEOPLE's DATA STANDARDS
SUPPOSE 'MONEY' WOULD only BE SOMETHING TO HELP US COUNT INSTEAD OF SPECULATE, then some paintings wouldn't be as expensive as building houses and feeding
thousands of poor people.
SUPPOSE all STATES , FIRMS AND COMPANIES WORLDWIDE;
WOULD PAY EVERYONE THE SAME MONEY FOR THE SAME WORK : a minimum amount THAT IN AN ECOLOGICAL WAY PROVIDES IN EVERYTHING MODERN LIFE HAS TO OFFER.
SUPPOSE TEACHERS WORLDWIDE DON'T teach more than ten pupils each class and carbuilders would refuse to much flexibility.
Suppose THAT ALL MATERIALS, GROUNDS, GOODS and services HAVE A GLOBAL STANDARDISED PRICE expressed in one single worldcurrency.
SUPPOSE EVERYBODY WHO DOESN'T WORK IN A SOLIDARY WAY RECEIVES LESS.
(except really sick people)
SUPPOSE EVERYONE's ADMINISTRATION IS BEING DEALTH WITH IN one way :
EACH ONE NUMBER, ENLARGED WITH 3 LETTERS THAT CONNECT THE PERSON WITH ONE OF THE 15 PROJECTS IN LIVE :
FOOd / HOUsing / WORk / SECurity/ HEAlth/ EDUcation/ ENErgy/ PROduction / DIStribution/
TRAnsport / ENVironment/ MONey/ TELecommunication/ SOCiety / RELations/
SUPPOSE EVERY PUBLIC SERVICE IS BEING PAYED BY AN EQUAL CONTRIBUTION OF EVERYBODY (once a month automatically taken from our wage
, before we get it) , a system that would make public transport and the highways of
telecommunication accessible for everyone , a system that if there already only was more social maturity, could be used in other areas too ( goods or certain services) .
SUPPOSE WE WOULD UNITE AND PUT FORWARD OUR PROGRAM ON ALL 15 PROJECTS AND HAVE A WORLDWIDE ELECTION ON IT …BEFORE WE ORGANISE WORLDWIDE ELECTIONS AS TO PUT IN CHARGE THE LOCAL, PROVINCIAL , CONTINENTAL AND WORLDWIDE DIRIGENTS OF EACH PROJECT.
SUPPOSE THE QUALITY OF LIFE BECAME MORE IMPORTANT THEN A LOT OF BUREAUCRATIC AND COMMERCIAL STUPIDITY…suppose we all learned to become aware of our real consciousness that looks to enrichen itself by means of our collective and individual history.
Let us first give some motivation for each of the projects and let us add a first list of our demands on each project before we compose some standard files or start constructing the election file on our demands so far as the program itself is concerned.
COMMITTEE FOR NEW SIMULTANEOUS INTERNATIONAL ELECTIONS, NECESSARY TO CREATE MORE EQUALITY
PRESENTS THE 15 PRO.CO.C.I.T. - PROJECTS
PRODUCERS CONSUMERS COLLECTIVIZE INTERNATIONALIZE TELEMATISIZE_:::::each person and company or institution…will administratively belong to one of the fifteen projects. ::::::each consumer has his place (number)in one of the projects and their sectors….
P R O J E C T W O R K
----MOTIVATION : A LOT OF PEOPLE EXPERIENCE THEIR WORK AS BORING BECAUSE THE TOTALLY FREE MARKET DOES NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH WELLPAYED JOBS FOR THEM.
HAVING A JOB STILL IS NOT A RIGHT FOR EVERYBODY. WORKING-PEOPLE CANNOT CHANGE EASILY TO A NEW JOB BECAUSE OF THE SCARCITY OF JOBS.
IN A NEW INTERNATIONALLY ORGANIZED AND STANDARDIZED ECONOMY, COMPETIVITY WILL NOT BE BASED ON EXPLOITATION ANY MORE, BECAUSE ALL PRICES AND PRODUCTION CONDITIONS WILL BE STANDARDIZED.
THE HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATIONS OF FIRMS AND INSTITUTIONS
MUST WORK WITH TOO MUCH DIFFERENT BUREAUCRATIC REGLEMENTS AND STATUTES.
THERE IS A LOT OF WORK AHEAD IF WE WANT TO STANDARDIZE THESE TOOLS IN OUR COMPAGNIES ,WHILE WE WILL START WORKING ON ADMINISTRATIVE UNIFICATION.
-----DEMANDS : PEOPLE WORKING IN HUMAN RESOURCES SHOULD CREATE INTERNATIONAL DATA TO WORK WITH , on the folowing bases :
° SAME WORK SAME PAY ° LESS DIFFERENCE IN PAY ( 1/2 maximum difference)
°INDIVIDUAL PREMIUM OR INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION SHOULD BE WELL ORGANISED ON AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE MEASURABLE OBJECTIV RESULTS
°PEOPLE WHO STUDY SHOULD HAVE AN INCOME
°EVERYBODY SHOULD BE ABLE TO WORK WITHIN REASONABLE DISTANCE OF HIS WORK
project t e l e m a t i c s
----MOTIVATION : THERE IS T MUCH ANARCHY IN THE USE OF THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS
IN TELEMATICS , THE REAL POSSIBILITIES ARE COMMERCIALIZED.
-------DEMANDS : ° CREATION OF A TELEMATIC UNIVERSAL MANAGMENT SYSTEM (T.U.M.S.)
A SYSTEM TO BE USED IN EVERYTHING THAT HAS TO DO WITH ORGANISATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE MANAGMENT OF THE PROJECTS AND THEIR SECTORS...
IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO CONTROLE AND COORDINATE, each GOUVERNEMENT AND EACH
MANAGMENT SHOULD USE THE SAME TUMS-system…to know about how many people ? where ?
Who ? what ? how much ? when ?…
° TUMS SHOULD BECOME A PROJECT TO INTEGRATE THE 15 PROJECTS
AND MANAGE THE SUPERSTRUCTURE OF MODERN AND FUTURE TELEMATICS.
IN ORDER TO DO SO COMPANIES DEALING WITH HARD& SOFTWARE SHOULD UNITE TO CONSTRUCT ONE standardizedTUMS-plan, instead of purchasing silly competition games.
°massproduction of a MULTIFUNCTIONAL TELETERMINAL
project t r a n s p o r t
------MOTIVATION : TO STOP POLLUTION SINCERELY SOMETHING DRASTIC MUST BE DONE
____DEMANDS : ° FREE PUBLIC TRANSPORT mainly in the cities (pay =by small equal contrib.)
project s e c u r i t y
-----MOTIVATION : CRIMERATES , traffic AND WARS ARE KILLING AND SICKENING
----DEMANDS : °MORE SOCIAL JUSTICE IS LESS CRIME AND WAR
°RECONVERSION OF WAR-ECONOMY
°ARMIES SHOULD INTERNATIONALLY BE USED AS FORCES THAT HELP
WITH NATURE-DISASTERS, BUILDING DIKES,,. helping fire -department…
°CREATION OF ONE POLICE FORCE FOR EACH KIND OF CRIME.(one data)
°INTERNATIONALLY CONTROLED DESTRUCTION OF WEAPONS for war
°TRAFFIC POLICE COULD USE SOME HELP WHEN THERE IS NO MORE 'work'
IN THE ARMY
project p r o d u c t i o n
-----MOTIVATION : INSTEAD OF MOVING TOWARDS COOPERATION THERE ARE WARS GOING
ON BETWEEN COMPANIES: THE VICTIMS ARE THE DISMISSED AND THE
PEOPLE AND FAMILIES WITH TOO MUCH STRESS
____DEMANDS : °MANAGERS SHOULD CREATE WORLDWIDE FILES CONCERNING
PRODUCTION/ STOCKAGE/PRODUCERS/ PRICES/DISTRIBUTION/
TRANSPORT…for each single product or raw material
°IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO DO SO THEY SHOULD UNITE ORGANISATIONALLY IN FUNCTION OF THE PRODUCT THEY MAKE
°NO MORE WASTE-ECONOMY :replacing and saving paper, wood…
project d i s t r i b u t i o n
-----MOTIVATION : different prices kill jobs alsO
___DEMANDS : °SAME PRICES WORLDWIDE MORE JOBS IN BIG STORES
°EQUAL PRICES FOR SERVICES __FREE PROFESSIONS…
project h o u s i n g
-----MOTIVATION : MILLIONS LIVE IN TERRIBLE HOUSING -CONDITIONS OR PAY TO
°INVENTARISATION OF HOUSES/ NEEDED HOUSES/ HOUSES TO BE REPAIRED/
HOUSES TO BE BUILD/ …in order to be able to do so once again all kinds of firms dealing with housing
, renting, building…should be obliged to join their information if they don't discover the benefits earlier.
°STOP SPECULATION …why not a law that says that if you own more than one house you are obliged to sell it, instead of renting it…
°MORE NATURE IN THE CITIES (for example farms for children…)
°ONE INTERNATIONAL RENTING PRICE
project h e a l t h
---MOTIVATION : THE HEALTH OF SOME ANIMALS SEEMS TO BE MORE IMPORTANT THEN THE HEALTH OF MILIONS OF PEOPLE WHILE THE WEST TAKES TOO MANY DRUGGS INSTEAD OF EXAMENING THE INFLUENCE OF STRESS AT WORK OR THE INNER AND OUTER RELATIONSHIPS OF THE HUMAN BEING AND ALL HIS SUBJECTIVE NEEDS.
---DEMANDS : °BETTER NOURISHMENT /HEALTH CARE IN THE THIRD WORLD
°More natural forms of healing, less anti-biotics…
°One equal anual contribution to pay for health-service (no more bureaucracy of 'getting your
°Birth Control Program
project f o o d
---MOTIVATION : THE OLD SYSTEM INVENTS LAWS TO THROW FOOD AWAY AND TO FORBID PRODUCTION WHILE MILLIONS STARVE
__DEMANDS : °HELP- PROGRAMS FOR POOR FARMERS EVERYWHERE
(why not organised by the farmers and the tool-making industry here ?)
project e n v i r o n m e n t
----MOTIVATION : YOU KNOW WE WILL HAVE TO LIMITE POLLUTION…if not…
----DEMANDS : °RECYCLING STARTS WITH SORTING THE CARBAGE
°also look for measures in other projects (transport…)
°hundreds of other measures
project e d u c a t i o n
-----MOTIVATION : GOUVERNEMENTS CUT ON EDUCATION TO SAVE THEIR BUDGET
/TEACHING HISTORY , FILOSOPHY AND PSHYCHOLOGY FEW TEACHERS
ARE REALLY CAPABLE OF THESE DAYS
___DEMANDS °CLOSER LINKS BETWEEN PROFESSION ANSD SCHOOL
°LESS PUPILS IN THE CLASSES (not more than ten is a good start)
°LINKS BETWEEN THE PROJECTS WORK (human resources firms or human
resources parts of compagnies ) and THE PROJECT EDUCATION
and links also to the educational projects ( exams, …) in other projects
°A LOT OF ATTENTION SHOULD GO TO THE PROJECTS PRESS AND
CULTURE THAT COULD BE INTEGRATED UNDER THE PROJECT
EDUCATION (why not separate nets for each kind of film, for documentaries…)
Project e n e r g y
-----MOTIVATION : NOT ENOUGH EFFORTS ARE BEING MADE TO SAVE OR PRODUCE ENERGY
___DEMANDS °INVESTING IN ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF GAINING ELECTRICITY
°INVESTING IN EDUCATING IN SAVING
project m o n e y
---MOTIVATION : THE SPECULATIVE ASPECT OF MONEY MUST DISSAPEAR
_DEMANDS : °see PEOPLE's DATA(suppose…)
°SIMPLE CONTRIBUTION FOR INSURANCE
Project s o c i e t y (political management)
MOTIVATION : WILL THE 'LAST ONES' BE THE FIRST ONES IN HISTORY ? THE WORLD WAS ALWAYS RULED BY THE ONES WHO HELD THE ECONOMICAL POWER… IT WERE ALWAYS THE POWER-ATTEMPTS OF THE LAWER CLASSES THAT PUSHED history IN NEW DIRECTIONS : the ones who owned the land, the money, the means of production decided and still decide most of the time. DECISSIONS ON WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO HAVE A JOB OR ABOUT HUNGER AND WARSPENDING AND ENVIRONMENT SHOULDN' T BE TAKEN IN FUNCTION OF SPECULATION. TO MANNY PARTYMEMBERS OBEY THE money -minded SPECULATORS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THEIR PARTY. UNION MEN MAINLY FIGHT FOR PARTIAL PROBLEMS AND AREN' T encouraged TO LOOK FOR GLOBAL SOLUTIONS AND ACTION…if they start doing so they are mostly thrown out anyway . Only sometimes people really show that they aren't afraid of change. Only some small groups try to organize that resistance…but they do not a collective alternative to manage society in another way . Even if they have the same ideology, they stay divided because each group understands the historical background and future developments or the role from this or that group in society otherwise. IF THIS INTRESTS YOU …LET US KNOW.
° ALL THE DEMANDS IN 'PEOPLE' S DATA' and THE DEMANDS OF THE PROJECTS AND A
WORLD -WIDE REFERENDUM ON THIS, starting behind our pc's, in our pubs , reunions, companies…
°IF ALL THIS CANNOT FIND HIS EXPRESSION IN THE CLASSICAL DEMOCRACY WE ENHERITED FROM HISTORY AND WHO TRIES TO DIVIDE US IN SO MANY WAYS,
THIS MEANS IF POLITICIANS DO NOT LISTEN TO NECESSITIES THAT WILL IMPLEMENT
THEMSELVES ANY HOW…THEY WILL LOOSE THEIR JOB FOR A CHANGE.
°WHY Can’t WE REPLACE THE OLD SYSTEM OF ELECTIONS BY A NEW ONE ?
Candidates for the local management functions could present themselves on the lists of the projects, not on the list of the parties , except the list of the project 'society', where one still would be able to vote for the ones having to manage jurisdiction, administration of the population, notarial things (since politicians mainly are lawyers they would find themselves at home.
PROJECT-ELECTIONS WOULD REPLACE PARTY-ELECTIONS MOSTLY , and THE ONES ELECTED PROVINCIALLY COULD ELECT THE CONTINENTAL GOVERNEMENT, who AT THE SAME TIME WOULD BE THE WORLD -GOVERNEMENT.
The local counsels should be attended by the controlling committees from street or company.
But before we can have all this we must simply start with discussion- groups.
New ways of protesting will emerge and are emerging.
Project r e l a t i o n s
__MOTIVATION : THERE ARE A LOT OF OBJECTIVE RELATIONSHIPS AS WE CAN EXPERIENCE THEM IN ONE OF THE MENTIONED PROJECTS OF SOCIETY.
THOSE OBJECTIVE RELATIONSHIPS EVOLUATE IN A COLLECTIVE WAY JUST LIKE EACH HUMAN BEIING CAN EVOLUATE IN A PERSONAL WAY OF DEALING WITH THE SUBJECTIVE THINGS IN LIFE : AM I A NIHILISTE OR SOMEBODY WHO LIKES PHILOSOPHY , SCIENCE…, am I emotionally strong enough to have a good influence on those who surround me, however contradictory this good influence at first sight may seem ?
IN MANY CASES THE BEHAVIOUR and thought OF MEN REFLECTS THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE RULING CLASS . MUCH IN RELIGION AND SURELY IN NATIONALISM STILL PREFENDS US FROM GETTING CLOSER TO OUR COMMON ROOTS. WHY too much SPECULATE ABOUT LIFE AFTER DEAD, WHILE THERE ARE ENOUGH TASKS TO BE FOUND HERE .
Discovering why your life was and is and will be your life is much more interesting. ..it’s a rather personal voyage to wisdom. ANYWAY SCIENCE ALREADY PROVED ELECTRONS HAVE AN ETERNAL EXISTENCE…and because everything exists of electrons we will return to the elements we came from : the ever recomposing elements to be found in the earth, wind, light and fire…maybe even in the anti-matter …who nows ? All the elements together formed our spirit, that's for sure .
°LEARN TO COMMUNICATE WITH YOURSELF AND OTHERS
°LEARN TO READ AND WRITE AND DISTINGUISH THE POSITIVE FROM THE NEGATIVE EVEN IF THE NEGATIVE SOMETIMES CONTRIBUTES TO THE POSITIVE, the positive must lead.
°LEARN TO OBSERVE IN A VERY BALANCED WAY WHAT IS HAPPENING IN YOUR TOTAL EVIRONMENT.
°LEARN TO DEAL WITH NEGATIVE EMOTIONS
°LEARN TO ALWAYS KEEP ON WONDERING ABOUT THINGS AND PEOPLE LIKE YOU KEEP ON WONDERING ABOUT SOMEBODY YOU LOVE …everything and everybody can teach you how to make better …how to maintain your good vibrations better.
°LEARN TO TRUST ON THE POWER IN YOU AND TO SOMETIMES HELP OTHERS ONLY BY TRUSTING ON THEIR INNER ENERGY, not by doing something they ought to do..
°LEARN TO BE AND TALK HONNEST, also in sometimes strange ways and learn to take the just options
philosophical theater monologue
Gaining insight into the great drama that we play in becomes more and more necessary. Such insight begins with thinking about how we can expand our practical, everyday limited consciousness. If you want to understand reality, try to stay within reality, without getting discouraged by it.
"To understand, to be aware" ... is the most important condition to be able to work towards a more developed level of society. A society that rules according to the needs of the entire world.
That means that you must start to avoid all kinds of prejudices and fake or twisted news. Our motive ? Wanting to prove that want truth, translated into objective journalism will eventually win from the rampant possessiveness of power mongers.
We have the opportunity to analyze history as one interconnected unity, skills and sciences enough to understand the meaning of life in fact. How can we make a better world…only hoping for it is not enough. One should understand which individuals or groups try to mislead people of good will.
Hope. Whether hope in a human, a system or hope is in an idea (hope for justice, solidarity… whatsoever) ... hope is important. Hope is motivation, is believing in. Without hope and faith you cannot overcome problems. But it can be dangerous to orientate yourself on half-truths or things that are unreal or not social.
All those who came before us, were looking for answers even before culture gave them. Most of history the oldest part of our ancestors were satisfied with what nature gave them. One thing is certain: what they once sustained and passed on , that is what we are now. If our mind is merely to be explained materially, then their minds in a specific, physical, genetic sense ... are not dead ... and they still indirectly teach us to appreciate the simple things in nature. The rest of us, our environment, our habits, our culture, what I am saying now, obviously a lot came of them ... and still each generation adds it’s contribution. By reading, studying, discussing, organizing, presenting alternative. However ... thinking about 'origin and being "is it so difficult that we hide too much behind other pursuits, ideals or habits?
Spirituality seems to be a form of energy that is bound to matter, it sometimes seems possible only in the NOW and sometimes it seems that we move beyond this life to the force fields of all the abstract virtues that we invoke for some strengthening in life without letting us catch by words like 'God' or 'time'. The biological and spiritual ... are one with 's past,
Matter made life, spirit is a kind of matter as well, radiation…we invented 'god' and we know "life can arise by wishing I”t. This magic may know no bounds, but let us be realistic. Believers in God say that ‘wishing’ came before the facts. At the other end of the line of thought are the materialists, not in a daily, but in the philosophical sense. Materialists, not in the sense of "just eating and drinking and lusts and never enough," or " everything for me and not for another' not in the sense of "never content”. These are twisted meanings ,used in the other, the idealist camp as spiritual defense weapons were. No need for this in fact. Materialists see measurable forces as their origin. With them, the order is just the opposite: one matter, two idea (the brains as a product of material evolution, the most highly developed matter ...our brain… or isn’t it? If Idealist could accept that the radiation were we all developed from as well is a kind of matter, then there was no problem.
Is our spirit born as our our soul goes ?... We’ll see about that later haha (literally and figuratively). We can only really see that 'being' is bound to almost always measurable forces, but ... How do you measure your feelings ... and from where come your symbolic dreams? Leaving some mystery is inspirational of course. Physical and chemical laws had their own screenwriter: the urge to survive, the attraction and repulsion. Let all those philosophical things not separate us. More interesting than getting divided about too much philosophical contradictions or breaking one’s head ... is to discover that history is not only primarily determined by the incentives of those who think about it, or basically by the circumstances in which people live…not only by collective and individual contributions, but also by not completely defined laws in fact.
Friends, comrades, brothers and sisters, if necessary compatriots; Human Beings ; how important they finds themselves, think much too little as a group or larger whole.
If you view things objectively and socially, without putting personal prejudices to certain persons or institutions and their actions directly in a 'good' or 'bad'-quota evaluating; if you see behind all those things a 'right' or 'in this or that conditions doomed to failure' development to ... ‘ then you're on your way to begin to understand that the growth of the individual awareness contributes to the expansion and refinement of helping the collective ... and vice versa.
The higher the degree of development and the quality of the collective, the greater the cake individual and the individual potential. For example, when more people would understand the importance of a well-functioning workers movement and the power of solidarity, it would be very much possible. Very much of what now seems impossible.
Too few people wonder how it is that they are without work or why there are others that are hungry and others who have to destroy their butter mountains and unsold fruit ... or there also are the ones that make weapons there d' to destroy others again ... etc. They pose themselves too little questions, sometimes answers are given to them, but the answers never seems to fit into a larger whole. A lot of people just want a job, an income, they don’t want to harm other people. And most of us are environmentally conscious. But things like unemployment, hunger, war and environmental degradation not only will disappear with good will, but inadequate, to outdated structures and greed will have to vanish ...... you start there against? There is seemingly no power at present to influence things positively. And so we once again don’t start talk about those things again . Keep on talking about them is of course is important; because as the sun light ... those things are so important to humans. ‘How and by whom societies are organized’ indeed is an important issue for our collective well-being. Not?
Where they kept us busy with so far ? What should we care about eating with golden spoons of rice, if you know that here with us there is a shortage of food production. Must we teach our children that there awaits an eternal punishment for them if they do not follow the Roman Pontiff ... or should we rather talk them about keeping the world a good place for their offspring? What now has precedence: the rapprochement, confidence and organization between those who work or are unemployed… promoting and creating something social together in the city streets or work places... or continue to propagate against each other that you can do nothing that there are no alternatives ? Don’t you overestimate the problems without seeing the possibilities ? I ask again: what has priority: what water they can baptize with or bring water where there is none? A priest has something in common with a worker today: the majority of workers also have 'anonymous' bosses. Therefore, perhaps even this small critical ode to the Bible:
You all, atheists, theists or I do not know: All -ists- stop the quarrel become artists. Too much attachment to the word God mystifies reason, the eternal already was there, is there, will be forever here…it ligers in ourselves ! Don’t believe the story of ‘the chosen people, everything moves in the same directions when it comes together. The spiritual goes beyond just feeling and thinking.
There was, there is, there could be enough.
Economically strong wanted, like, will always want more. There was, there is, there will always remain limited consciousness about own mortality. Should we therefore continue to work like ants, deepening some philosophic issues, social problems ?
Who leads the fight for the possession of money, land, work, food and war machines?
The strong, the haves intrude themselves the easiest Organizing the dependents is more difficult.
They must continue to choose each other. For even the least miserable among them is a victim of the struggle for the highest profit systems.
Greed and death awareness beards manslaughter within one’s own kind. Vanity and knowledge don’t match, it manipulates knowledge for speculative reasons.
Meanwhile, the dependents work at their collective subconscious ... peace people, anti-racists and anti-fascists, environmentalists, leftists, the people of the Doctors Without Borders and many others all in their boxes without joint program. Perhaps behind the collective conscious nothing more powerful can exist ... or do you think the idea and feeling exist independently of matter?
The madness of fear, killings, the opposition between finite by greed and infinite by sharing.
The repulsive of having too much at the expense of another ... one can only resolve by changing the large ownership structures…ore by sharing.
The learned shame for nakedness of body and real facts. The urge to hide your from childhood often dismissed creatives initiatives.
The frivolous of faith and believing in an easier over romantic antimatter live... where some people prefer not wait for ... to get there ... while they are already there in effect. Don’t they know it’s all about the theatre her below, learning to be strong and changing the negative in to the positive, knowing into awareness ? Who will always tell them the opposite ?
The man that groove for the roots of the tree of knowledge was like Moses or any of the hundreds of other writing seekers. Darwin's Adam's and Eve's, conditionally immortal ...
... Still they live ... wasting to much of their limited eternity ... little do they stand still and little they think together; fail to correctly observe ... missing the power of really acting together…they must help each other to save the collective values and dump the things that make them sick.
Threatening them from chasing them from what could be their paradise, does not help ... the threat of total destruction is the reality. Repeated promises, deceptive improvement, repeatedly beating, killing, all those good people ... that can never lead to the benefit off all. Always those commercial relaxation, OK, but not as a new opium of the people. The earth won’t be saved by the domination of the culture of greed.
They built a city, a tower, exterior signs to feel common, it doesn’t work otherwise. Not the invisible main character of the ancient Biblical book confused speech, still those methods are used by the powerful.
The power of the one’s orienting themselves, oppressed; their striving for selflessness ; their helpers' exemplary strength, working on a new approach to a universal language; but what is one, alone with a language in towns and villages ... alone, still divided? The fewer misunderstandings, the less systems, the fewer conflicts of interest.
Languages do not have disappear when you can work with one language among all people ,the language of planning together and discussions, the language of deciding and dividing honestly
From the work of millions of slaves who obeyed hundreds of thousands of officers who tangle with thousands of servants and hundreds of bosses and dozens of rulers; grew the positive understanding of the lowest class. When there are too many drops that flow over the spark that poses the question of ownership will ignite. Question from whether depends a mature and organized basis.
When interaction between a stressed economy and social inspiration go together with personal freedom and daring collective actions…in the end no possession will be that big that it can exploit. When birth control will not be used as a racist argument, but as something reasonable everywhere. When extermination for the difference in wealth and race shall be abolished. When having a job will be a right. When possession will mean : your house an socialized enterprises, small companies, common factories …only then all social inspiration will have reached its peak.
Are we aware that the political, social and economic developments mainly follow negative laws? Why are we so silent and sparing with our opinion? We still see the truths behind poverty and glitter? Whence comes that other society in our and in other areas?
In what society we want to evolve together? Because nothing stands still. We must learn to see history as developments that seek to reward their social players. What mechanisms still cause war, environmental degradation, underdevelopment, armaments, hunger, exploitation, impoverishment, illiteracy ... commercial and cultural domination?
Too much possessiveness, too few opportunities for security for children. Too narcissistic reflexes that imprison us in our family. Distrusting greedy people doesn’t stop them. Too much hassle and routine. Not enough to do too, little satisfaction. Too much arrogance, property and discontent, leaves of 'never enough' and 'always less than another. " Too much inexperience to deal with the lower part of the love when it all seems so difficult.
The collective antisocial can be prevented by controlling effective leaders and to call them to account. By first voting for a global program and then for the directors on project lists.
Children, your new bearers of life, you are not served with a falsified history. Are you going to allow being divided amongst your friends as well? Or will you see to unite the infinite benefits of orientating on objective sources? Wisdom, however tied to tough conditions, only afterwards appears to be an improvement. Wisdom can first start, when a lot has been experienced. Why should suffering continue to always come before wisdom ? Demonstrating the lameness of some old structures. Justice, born of the power to the clumsiness from the world ... must still grow from social progress ... must not go backwards.
Realizing that these insights are a primarily collective success, those legacies that I try to put into words, I’ll stop traduce them here in English, I’ve got a lot more in Dutch. I thank you for your attention ... and I wish you much strength to continue to build on these insights.
LA LUTTE FINALE SE PREPARE CHAQUE JOUR...
future modèle de gestion de société
On doit restructurer la politique. C.O.N.S.C.I.E.N.S.C.E., le COmmité pour des Nouveaux Elections Simultanés Nécessaire pour créer plus d'Egalité...vous propose de voter son :
Supposez l'argent serait quelque chose pour nous aider à calculer au lieu de spéculer...alors certains peintures ne seraient pas si chèr que construire des maisons pour des centaines de gens.
Supposez que chaque Etat et compagnie sur une échelle mondiale payerait le même salaire pour le même travail, une quantité qui offrait d'une façon écologique la possibilité à avoir une vie humaine.
Supposez que les enseigneurs mondiale pouvaient avir des classes de seulement dix personnes.
Supposez que tous les matériaux et services avaient une prix unique, exprimé dans une monnaie mondial. Supposez que l'administration de chacun et chaque firme serait traité d'une même façon : chacun un numéro de téléphone, élargit avec trois lettres qui donnent connection avec chaque des 15 projets de la société : NOUriture/MAIson/TRAvail/SECurité/EDUcation/ENErgy/PROduction/DIStribution/TRAnsport/
Supposez que chaque service publique est payé par une contribution égale de tout le monde(pris une fois par mois de notre salaire avant qu'on le touche) Un tel système un accès presque gratuit aux transports et télécommunication. Ce système pouvait être élargit à d'autres secteurs(produits et autres services) pourvu il existerait une maturité sociale très large.
Supposez qu'on nous organiserait et qu'on mettait notre collective à un accord internationale, avant qu'on organiserait le second tour de ses nouveaux éléctions pour élire les dirigent local, provincial , continental et mondiale des différents projets.
Supposez que la qualité de la vie deviendrait plus important que beaucoup de bureaucratie et de stupidité commerciale.
Supposez que qu'on devenait conscient du fait que l'histoire nous pousse vers l'organisation d'un meilleur monde avec de emploies pour tout le monde, pauvreté, guerre, pollution...
Pour chacun des projets on va donner d'abord un peu de motivation et après on va posser nos demandes. Il faudra aussi déveloper un 'site' pour voter sur l'internet.
C.ON.S.I.E.N.C.E presente : les 15 projets
-motivation : beaucoup de gens trouvent leur boulot ennuyante parce que la marché libre ne donne pas assez du travail/avoir du travail n'est pas encore un droit/on peut pas de façon simple changer son travail, parce qu'il y en a pas assez/ Dans un économie standardisé, la concurrence ne sera pas basé sur l'exploitation puisque les conditions seront les même pour tous. Les Resources Humaines, les administrations personnels travaillent encore avec trop de différents statuts. Il faudrait les simplifier et standardiser.
-demandes : LE DROIT SUR UN EMPLOI AVEC UN SENS/MEME TRAVAIL MEME SALAIRE/LES ETUDIANTS DOIVENT ETRE PAYE AUSSI/
-motivation : pour l'administration des projets les moyens technologique ne sont pas standardisés, l'internet est trop utilisés uniquement pour des raisons commerciales
-demandes : la création d'un Système Universel Telematic pour le Gestion des projets (TUMS)un système pour l'administration et organisation des projets. Pour coordiner et controler chaque gouvernement et entreprise devait employer le même système.pour savoir qui veut quel emploie et quoi et où, pour savoir le demande de tous les produits et services. La population pourrait mondiale suivre ces données. TUMS serait le projet pour intégrer les 15 projets et le pour gérer le secteur telecom.
Une campagne d' alphabétisations devrait être organisée pour tout le monde.
-motivation :pour mettre fin à la pollution, le transport publique doit devenir principale
-demandes : une petite taxe standardisé ferait le transport publique presque gratuit
-motivation : il y aurait moins de crime parce que tout le monde aura une emploie/ mettre un fin aux guerres
-demandes : abolition des guerres/ reconversion de l'industrie d'armement/les armées vont être utilisés pour aider en cas de désastres naturelles, grands travaux publiques pour éviter des désastres/
seulement la police a le droit de porter des armes
-motivation : au lieu de collaborer, il y a de guerres entres les entreprises, les victimes en sont les sans emploies, les accidents de travails et les individus et familles avec trop de stress
-demandes : les gérants devraient utiliser le système TUMS pour rendre l'information de leur entreprises libre pour tout le monde : stockage, prix, demandes de personnels... . Les producteurs devraient se réunir par group de produit. Des mesures pour éviter le gaspillage et la pollution devraient être pris.
-motivation : trop de spéculation
-demandes : même prix pour même produits ou service/ création des données télématique pour savoir ou se trouvent quels produits et lequel et le moyen de transports le plus éfficient
-motivation : des millions vivent dans des conditions inhumaines ou payent trop de loyer
-demandes : inventaire des maisons nécessaires, à réparer, construire.../tarifs sociales, pas de spéculation
-motivation : le vieux système invente des lois pour détruire les fruits & légumes etc pour des raisons spéculatives et encourage parfois à ne pas produire
-demandes : à manger pour tout le monde en unifiant tous les efforts d'agriculture sur une échelle mondiale/ tous ceux qui travaillent dans ce secteur doivent recevoir une salaire uniforme s'ils travaillent leur terrains bien
-motivation : réduire la pollution
-demandes : pas de sur consumation/triage immondices/recyclage/transport publique/entretiens des parcs nature/lois pour protéger les animaux/plus d'énergie propre...
-motivation : ne pas épargner sur l'enseignement, les pays pauvres doivent avoir des conditions comme
dans les autres pays pour enseigner
-demandes : pas trop d'élèves dans une classe/plus d'attention aus sciences humaines : philosophie, histoire, psychologie.../plus d' échange entre entreprises et l'enseignement/enseignement pour adultes aussi/enseignement doit aussi apprendre à interpreter les medias objectivement
-motivation : trop de gaspillage et pollution
-demandes : investir dans l' énergie propre
-motivation : l'aspect spéculative a des conséquences désastreuse dans le monde
-demandes : uniquement utilisation administrative de l'argent/une monnaie mondiale avec la même valeur partout/les banques doivent s'unir
projet gestion de la société
-motivation : les décisions sur qui a le droit de travailler ou guerre ou pas de guerre...sont toujours pris par l'élite politique. Les dirigent politique ne peuvent pas faire une politique qui va contre le programme globale. Ceux qui prennent les décisions dans les parties politiques et les syndicats suivent toujours ce que les spéculateurs veulent . On tourne dans des petits rond au lieu de résoudre les problèmes sur d'une façon mondiale. Si on va suivre leur logique, cela voudrait dire qu'on doit tous aller travailler pour le salaire le plus bas du monde...leur capitalisme effondrait vite alors. Ils existent des groupes qui veulent prendre une autre chemin, mais ils sont divisé sur l'interprétation de l'histoire et sur les tactiques à suivre et ils bordurent uniquement sur le bataille classique des syndicats : des bon salaires sans liaison mondiale et alternative globale
-demandes : tous les demandes des autres projets/ organisation des élections alternatives sur internet ou pression des comités sur les gouvernements nationaux ou administrations communales ou syndicats/
propagande pour un nouveau système d'élections internationale: d'abord pour une programme mondiale et après pour les dirigent. Pour neutraliser le boycot des grands spéculateurs il y aura pas des nationalisations. Sur le projet 'gestion de la société' on pourra élire les dirigent pour la justice, pour l'administration de la population et le premier qui aura une fonction pour coordiner Un jour les élections des dirigent de projets remplaceraient les élections classique et par projet et province quel un sera envoyé au gouvernement continentale. Le gouvernement continentale formerais le gouvernement mondiale. Principe de base pour organiser ces éléctions serait le nombre de habitants d'un province.
Les comités locale pourraient avoir des moyens de controle sur leurs communes et entreprises.
-motivation : on devrais apprendre à travailler sans la discipline qui impose le système ancien et on devait de plus près avoir un intérets pour les problèmes de le monde de nos jours
-demandes : accompagnement psychologique pour des problèmes subjectives entre les gens/
des medias objectives et indépendentes du capital spéculative
-motivation : de nos jours on utilise trop de médicaments, c'est mieux d'attaquer les sources des maladies comme la pollution, le stress, la culture commerciale, pas assez de contact avec la nature, tensions psychologiques
-demandes : produits naturelles de bon qualité, établissement d'un infrastructure médicale dans les pays pauvres, des soins médicale pour tout le monde (petite contribution de tout le monde)
Si la volonté et la nécessite pour discuter l'alternative collectiviste devient plus claire on peut commencer à inventer des actions. Organiser de la pression sur les mandataires politiques classique,
des arrêts de travails pour discuter l'alternative. Exiger du patronat qu'il paye les mêmes salaires dans les pays pauvres... . Des manifestations pour exiger des Nations Unis l'abolition des guerres et de la pauvreté en imposant les demandes de l'alternative collective. Tous les premiers des différents gouvernements doivent avoir un réunion pour aux moins interdire toute spéculation dans l'économie, même salaire pour le même travail, reconversion de l'industrie militaire, etc... .