OPAA : Octaaf's Politcal Analyses & Alternatives
+++THE IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPING AN IDEOLOGICAL METHOD
+++MATURITY COULD CHANGE THE WORLD
+++REVOLUTIONS SO FAR WERE OF A REFORMIST NATURE
+++A CHANGE IN ATTITUDE
+++LES RELATIONS HUMAINES OBJECTIVES
+++PROLETARIAN ADMINISTRATIAN AND HIERARCHY VERSUS BOURGEOIS STATE AND BOURGEOIS DEMOCRACY
+++LA LUTTE FINALE SE PREPARE CHAQUE JOUR
OPAA : Octo's Politcal Analyses & Alternatives
+++THE IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPING AN IDEOLOGICAL METHOD
An ideology is a way to understand life and it's different practical an theoretical meanings. Consciousness is born each time practical experiences ead to theoretical tinking and result in orientating and acting in an adapted way. Political history gives us much exemples of this. Sometimes only reforms are possible. Sometimes revolutionary reforms are beiing pushed by circumstances... a real revolution shall become possible when the global picture of circumstances is understood by a more interdisciplinary and worldwide orientated consciuosness. The same laws that guide history also can be found in our own emotional, pshychological and intelectual development and even in some relationships we encounter.
Consciousness is born out of matter, like theory is born out of practice.
If theories are not based on practice, we call them fantasies, which can be nice or dangerous or both. We call this 'idealism', it leads to confusion because it's no longer 'materialism'. Sometimes illusions are necessary to get back on the road of reality. Both in social as in personal life.
The theoretical way to understand life, is studying all the existing rational, objective sciences and combining them with the more subjective sciences and inject the result into practical life. The subjective sciencess depend on the objective ones because without 'matter' there can be no consciousness. At the same time the hierarchical weight of the subjective prevents the objective laws to impose them self on the general evolution of society and the human beiing...but this is always a temporary proces. An ideology is a way to understand both the history and present stage of the world and it's consequences on global living conditions.
However great some existing differences in exploitation might be, capitalisitic ideology also tneds to evoluate in the direction of socialst ideology...because the foundation for a worldeconomy and the way to manage it by modern technical means, still increase...this shall be an advantage once proletarians shall reunite in an effective and revolutionary way. And they shall, because the capitalistic inner contradictions that scientific socialism pointed out, still seem to remain unsolvable. But nobodyholds a cristal ball, so let's not insult each other if we have different opions on the economical strength of capitalism.
Important to remember is that a decreasing economy leads to a weakening of the ideology of the ruling class...at least if the oppressed class is not beaten fysically or brought to poverty...or has to little class consciousness left. The first task of the most conscious human beiings with an orientation towards proletarian ideology, must be to understand these proceses of evolution. Ones they do, they must present a global and general program of managing society and experiencing life in a different way. Theoretical explanations should correspond with the practical conditions they try to explain...but they should try to always be one step ahead.
Feodal ideology, with the aristocracy as it's ruling class, based it's power on an unclear concept of 'God',(and not on the eternal forces of nature who produced and developed consciousness) and mainly on the ownership of land and consequently economical and military power.
While all kind of historical facts happened according to changing living conditions and while the bourgeois rulers of the capitalist system used the proletarian discontent to take power from the nobles, they started developing the means of production and the production forces. The world was (and still is) forged and forced together in a very unethical way : wars, famine, unemployment, eclogical disasters, exploitation).
Capitalist ideology based it's power mainly on the private ownership of the means of production, on the production of commodities, trade and a wagesystem...while in theory the really socialsist thinkers of the last 150 years wanted to abolish these bourgeois-based things; in practice they had to be satisfied with all kind of economical, social ande political reforms that nowadays lead to a degree of wealth for only a limited number of workers. While in theory the socialist thinkers wanted communism, they saw State-Capitalism beiing established; while they wanted to abolish the State, they saw it beiing transformed in a continously strengthened apparatus in function of bourgeois ideology.
While they looked for unity amongst proletarians, they got divided on theoretical and practical or even personal bases. While reformism helped survive capitalism and the final technical revolution is now taking place and the world becomes more and more a global private company...it SEEMS bourgeois ideology overcame it's inner contradictions.
Suppose the capitalist system manages to create one worldmarket and one company or a high standard of living for the whole planet, shall it tehn have overcome it's contradictions ? No, because exploitation and surplusvalue shall continue to lead to overproduction. So why capitalism continues to dominate ? Because we continue to accept their ideology. Because our weaknes, capitalism can continue it's often historical task in an often bloody way. They still have the economical and military power to do so.
While every different group of scientific socialists has it's own calculations on the economical fitness of the current ruling system, no real alternative way of managing society is beiing put forward. While the bourgeois class and it's managers and politicians continue to invent more organisation in function of keeping in power; the majority of social or political 'workers'-organisations, limit themselves mainly to the small and limited economical battles. While the little 'gains' of this struggle within the borders of the system try to maintain the hughly different living standards of the different groups of modern proletarians...no organised group of workers not even claims an equal income for everybody in it's program...and no group explains how a society without a wagesystem and commodity production can produce and distribute in a more or less equal way. Are we afaid to use our imagination ? Do we need the hierarchical discipline and structures of our current economical, social and political rulers ? Are we, the millions who lead the practical day to day live that state, company and family offer us, so brainwashed that we keep on walking in the mill that the bourgeois-media keeps turning for us ?
How can we learn to get more assertive in a proletarian way ?
By taking an intrest in phylosophy, politics, history... By studying our own concrete living conditions where we work and live. By realising that the emotional and pshychological problems we are all confronted with (whether in ourselves or in all our different kinds of relations), are beiing agravated by the current system of production. That's where real ideology is all about, it's really a kind of spiritual matter that has nothing to do with the classical ideology of 'religion' interpretated in a conservative way, but with combining and connecting all the different kinds of consciousness we came to mention in this text and others. Human beiings can get a ot of energy from beiing conscious about these kind of things...or it can make them sick, because they realise they cannot change the world on their own : 'workers unite'.
+++MATURITY COUD CHANGE THE WORLD
As I explain in the text 'a change in attitude', there are a lot of problems facing our social and economical lives. I already explained a lot of political problems and put forward some solutions for those rather objective areas of life. If you want, I could compare these explanations and solutions once again with those of other individuals or groups or PARTies...but I'm not goiing to do this in this text. Every explanation or solution is PART of the way things evoluate in the course of the real future of mankind that is to be expected. Each view and alternative, whether based on an existing reformistic power or on the possible revolutionary challenges; reflects a certain degree of consciousness, based on material positions in society, as well as on the degree of subjective consciousness we've reached : for those who do not understand, I'm talking about less measurable things like solidarity, emotional, psychological ...even spiritual consciousness.
Solidarity is the collective as well as individual emotion we need to do our share of the work or our collective, again individual capacity to react and organise in favour of groups of people unther threat of unemployment, war, famine, disaster... . We still are dominated by the kind of ideology that says we should think as individuals, reacting only on our individual intrests. That's why unions still are so corporatistic and why big strikes for more general demands or manifestations against wars...still have so little impact. That's why a lot of us need things like money and beiing exploited as a stimulans to make us do any work at all. That's why absolute hierarchical organisation is still more effective then freely agreed and spontaneous arangements.
+++REVOLUTIONS SO FAR WERE OF A REFORMIST NATURE
In the former century, the 1917-revolution, in what was the beginning of the former Sovjetunion, took the country from a backward capitalist and semi-feodal country on the road to a state-capitalistic economy. The different groups that were the main players leading the developments and changes that farmers and workers or other classes demanded, were already activ in other countries like Germany...(mainly social-democrats) and they would have splits, ends and regroupments upon till today. In the last years of tsarism one could find ones political inspiration in groups like the cades, the social-revolutionaries, the bolsjevics, anarchos... .
Today, some workersgroups claim that capitalism was already decadent at the beginning of the century. In a moral way this is indeed very true. But in an economical way; that is in relation to the technological progres to be made and the production forces that were to be developed, this is not an entirely deepened pointed of view. Since the military and bureaucratic State power proved to be stronger then the coureageous revolts and organisation of the workers, they did not get the opportunity to prove that they could organise and develop the economy as 'disciplined' as the bourgeois State and companies could. After each revolution (that was in fact a 'revolt'), followed a counter-revolt...ending between the first and second worldwar in fascism...as a kind of SuperStatecapitalism. Were the minds already prepared to do away with the wagesystem and the production of commodities (commerce) in those days ?
Since the consciousnss of each social class traduces itself in different degrees of consciousness; there were a lot of different kinds of proletarian parties confronting established parties that were suposed to represent workers. Unity seemed to be and still is impossible on the basis of partydogma's. No unified program to present the workers had any succes. It could not have been otherwise, because the result of some
evolutions on a certain point in time and place cannot be other then the product of the material and ideological conditions people life unther.
One cannot expect of people having to work 12 hours a day, and having little welfare, that they take an intrest in reading about revolution in an academic way. Nowerdays the bourgeois-system tries to poison our minds with the values of their ideological (often idiotical) way of life...so we would stay as atomised as they would like us to be and to prefend that we get conscious of the fact that in reality we merely are the tools they are using. The way we lead our lives is the way they want us to lead our lives. We are beiing kept conditioned for their aims.
Should we wait for their economy to collaps once more in an unbearable way or should we wait for the moment when the new magical mystery toy of globalism meets massive resistence...or for the moment when people get fed up of stressed working and living conditions...and rise in an organised wy against this all ? Should we wait untill some people do not cling as much to their luxery any more and become activ ?
We, the ones garding the theoretical history, think to much only in terms of whether one is a Leninist, Trotskist, Stalinist...or another 'ist' with a familyname befor it. How are we going to intervene in the proces of workers eventually wanting to take power ? Now that we have elaborated our theories and each variety of ideas exist, how are we gooing to regroup ? Points of view can be different and we must keep on writing good articels, but we should be very prudent.
One should be as realistic to aknowledge the fact that for exemple China today is a more modern State then it was in 1927, because the Chinese CP-policy, in spite of it's numberous mistakes or alliances with the forces of the right at that time, contributed to that proces.
One should be able to say, without beiing insulted that some benefits ; acquired unther the former social experiments in the former USSR or the DDR, were better then the dailly live an increasingly part of their populations have now anno 2001 . Without beiing distrusted, one should be able to say that in times of war , the 'revolutionary theory of defaitism' (the war against each nation's own establishment) was more easy to put into practice in the days of the Russian Tsarism then in fascist occupied Europe.
After all our studying and writing we should become able to put forward our own program to be voted on one day. Afterwards the ones to controle such a program could be apointed by international elections also...no elections where voters can vote on 'parties', but international elections on PROJECTS. We have already a lot of concrete propositions on this...maybe you have also. Why wait untill workers liberate themselves on their own and start leadin 'councils' 'democratically'. Will then the majority be , as by a happy coincidence; the most 'conscious' part of the proletariat ? I'm afraid not. I'm not a supporter of certain 'chaos-theories'. Intervening in the class-struggle theoretically is one thing, guiding it in a practical way is another...leading in periods of struggle will prove to be necessary... . But what will we then have to offer ?
+++WORKERS ADMINISTRATIAN AND HIERARCHY VERSUS BOURGEOIS STATE AND BOURGEOIS DEMOCRACY
Folowing a number of discussions going on on the internet and outside it, it seems to me a lot of controverse exists on the question of how a socialist project is to replace the system of exploitation and concurrency.
Every group and all the not-organised individuals have their own ideas on this subject and the way alternatives are to be implemented.
If such a system is to establish itself and wishes to survive, it cannot do without strictly defining the notion 'proletarian hierarchy'.
According to me, proletarian dictatorship is not the rule of a party or the rule of the 'democratic centralism' of councils; or not a coalition between parties; but the coordinated action of the 'highest EXECUTIVE council of the internationally organised 'projects' (1 political legislative project called 'society' and 14 practical projects to manage society on a world base).
In a period of revolutionary struggles, legeslative 'councils' must come together to debate and decide on a transition program towards an non-capitalist society. To prepare this kind of situation we could already form, and in fact are forming embryonal committees.
Once an agreement on the demands for each project is reached, their international executive organ can organise international elections for or against such a transitional program.
Since that program will be mainly based on the needs of proletarians, such a program shall have a large majority. After the aproval of the program, the councils can organise international elections on a non-party base.
To appoint the responisible dirigents of each project in society, people would be able to give their votes for candidates arranged in one of the 15 projects necessary to manage society. Dirigents must follow the guidelines of the projects and can be replaced if they don't follow the program, or if they prove to be not ready to manage whatever is to be managed.
In this way the State, as an instrument in keeping capitalism in power, can be replaced by a proletarian hierarchy, capable of providing a real socialist alternative and a mode of functioning for the transition towards socialism ...which becomes more needed as years go by.
The 15 projects , needed to manage society in a modern, technocratical way, are : one legislative project, 14 executive projects, all having delegates in the legislative project)
-SOCIETY-project (legislative and juridicial matters : proletarian members from the councils can be candidate. Their can be a delegation from consumer)organisations as well. The project 'society' will have to debate on the demands for each project.
A temporary proposition and an exemple of this can be found on the homepage http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/9799
The main, unanswerd question is : 'can we go directly from a wage-based society towards a wage-less form of organising society ' ? Objectively we are ready for this; capitalism and we, the workers, have developed the material conditions for it, but are we ready for such a change, 'subjectively' ? We should put up an educational campaign on it...on all the aspects it includes.
The role of 'money' in a new non-speculative society, based on purely administrating production and distribution or public services in a first stage; could be reduced to buying food and consumer-goods (their prices based on worldwide standardised production conditions).
The cost of Public Services could be organised as subscriptions taken from our wage befor you get it.
A lot shall depend on what will happen to class-consciousness in its confrontation with the living-conditions to be expected unther a further rule of capitalism (objective factors) A lot shall depend also on our ability to organise an the amount of objection within workers rangs themself.
If Statereformism can keep capitalism goiing in times of depression, and an important number of proletarians, or independents whose livingconditions are effected in a negative way, will resist the proletarians that choose to organise in councils; then all kinds of proletarian propositions must avoid the civil war the bourgeois parts of society will eventually seek.
The executive projects for managing society can be arranged as : work/food/housing/energy/telematics/transport/environment/production/
I hope you understood this explanation. I know that different kinds of socialists are trying each to reach their goals in separated ways, basing themselves on different analyses of history. But do we not share the same goals and should we not learn to work together on a realistic an practical base, not just an academic one ?
Wether you have but your believes in reaching the socialist transformation of society by means of bourgeois-democratic elections for propaganda-purposes or whether you are organising on another base; our class needs a program and an alternative way to organise and manage society. In the mean while we (in general) still get the politicians we 'deserve', because of our low degree of assertivism and because of the fact we still cling to bourgeois ideology , whether politically or emotionally.
email@example.com You can come over for a discussion.
+++A CHANGE IN ATTITUDE
I wonder what military stratigists are already planning for the future.
Most of the modern developed countries can rely on professional troops.
Since they abolished the 'civil' militay duty for young men, they fight their wars from the air. They know that a massive rection against their wars is not evident in these times where their media prepares the minds months before they attack. 'Humanitary' Interventions' for situations they helped to create themselves.
They put Sadam in power. They armed the 'religious' lunatics in Afghanistan. They pushed nationalism in the East. They controled the political scene in the middle East and in Africa. They gained and still gain big money producing weapons. They supported one ethnic group against an other.
What are their plans. Will they 'intervene' in Russia once the proces of every kind of desintegration shall accelerate and shall threaten their newly found 'colony' ? They surely continue to destabilize their economical concurrents like China, using the trick of 'bourgeois democracy' again; or the 'red danger'.
They and all the ones that serve their system that fools us day in day out. They project their images of beiing rich and wealthy into our minds and oblige us to go and work to purchase a happy life, matching up to their standards. They put in the minds of millions that 'one exists more if one can buy more' They make us believe that working like robots adds to our personal development. They convinced us that producing goods is only possible if huge profits can be made. With the help of 'our' unions they teach us that lay-offs are indispensable to 'survive' .
They try to make some of their statements as the most natural order of things; so that 's why they dare defend the use of cheap medecins against Aids in South Africa for exemple. They pay their supermanagers and our footballplayers millions a year. Their States keep us well divided, according to our 'place' in the system. But still they keep saying we are all so equal.
Why do we KEEP PUTTING UP with this ? We vote, they stay in power, 'liberalising the world' more and more. State-related jobs keep some of us in a sort of obedience, the ones who oppose themselves put themselves out of a job, just like in private enterprises. We work, they live their lives on the profits we make. We keep on accepting their kind of hierarchy instead of inventing and imposing our own. Their system stays in place because of it's hierarchical cohesion. Some of us believe that a system of their own can do without hierarchy; but even equality cannot function without it. The political hierarchy we must work towards to, must
be a hierarchy that is based upon the dirigents of an economical and social program. If one day council all around the world shall organise elections, we should be able to first say yes to a global revolutionary program and then elect the ones guiding the different projects of society. The ones delegated by the worldcouncil and the ones internationally elected on the lists of the projects should be accepted as the highest hierarchy.
When ever there are indications that someone doesn't forfill it's responsabilities, according to what he or she was put in charge for, a majority of workers in a company , a project or council, could ask for that persons removal.
C.O.N.S.C.I.E.N.C.E. , the Committee for New Simultaneous International Elections ,Necessary to Create more Equality
PROPOSES YOU TO VOTE ON
A COLLECTIVE ALTERNATIVE ____________________________________________________
PEOPLE's DATA STANDARDS
SUPPOSE 'MONEY' WOULD only BE SOMETHING TO HELP US COUNT INSTEAD OF SPECULATE, then some paintings wouldn't be as expensive as building houses and feeding
thousands of poor people.
SUPPOSE all STATES , FIRMS AND COMPANIES WORLDWIDE;
WOULD PAY EVERYONE THE SAME MONEY FOR THE SAME WORK : a minimum amount THAT IN AN ECOLOGICAL WAY PROVIDES IN EVERYTHING MODERN LIFE HAS TO OFFER.
SUPPOSE TEACHERS WORLDWIDE DON'T teach more than ten pupils each class and carbuilders would refuse to much flexibility.
Suppose THAT ALL MATERIALS, GROUNDS, GOODS and services HAVE A GLOBAL STANDARDISED PRICE expressed in one single worldcurrency.
SUPPOSE EVERYBODY WHO DOESN'T WORK IN A SOLIDARY WAY RECEIVES LESS.
(except really sick people)
SUPPOSE EVERYONE's ADMINISTRATION IS BEING DEALTH WITH IN one way :
EACH ONE NUMBER, ENLARGED WITH 3 LETTERS THAT CONNECT THE PERSON WITH ONE OF THE 15 PROJECTS IN LIVE :
FOOd / HOUsing / WORk / SECurity/ HEAlth/ EDUcation/ ENErgy/ PROduction / DIStribution/
TRAnsport / ENVironment/ MONey/ TELecommunication/ SOCiety / RELations/
SUPPOSE EVERY PUBLIC SERVICE IS BEING PAYED BY AN EQUAL CONTRIBUTION OF EVERYBODY (once a month automatically taken from our wage
, before we get it) , a system that would make public transport and the highways of
telecommunication accessible for everyone , a system that if there already only was more social maturity, could be used in other areas too ( goods or certain services) .
SUPPOSE WE WOULD UNITE AND PUT FORWARD OUR PROGRAM ON ALL 15 PROJECTS AND HAVE A WORLDWIDE ELECTION ON IT …BEFORE WE ORGANISE WORLDWIDE ELECTIONS AS TO PUT IN CHARGE THE LOCAL, PROVINCIAL , CONTINENTAL AND WORLDWIDE DIRIGENTS OF EACH PROJECT.
SUPPOSE THE QUALITY OF LIFE BECAME MORE IMPORTANT THEN A LOT OF BUREAUCRATIC AND COMMERCIAL STUPIDITY…suppose we all learned to become aware of our real consciousness that looks to enrichen itself by means of our collective and individual history.
Let us first give some motivation for each of the projects and let us add a first list of our demands on each project before we compose some standard files or start constructing the election file on our demands so far as the program itself is concerned.
COMMITTEE FOR NEW SIMULTANEOUS INTERNATIONAL ELECTIONS, NECESSARY TO CREATE MORE EQUALITY
PRESENTS THE 15 PRO.CO.C.I.T. - PROJECTS
PRODUCERS CONSUMERS COLLECTIVIZE INTERNATIONALIZE TELEMATISIZE_:::::each person and company or institution…will administratively belong to one of the fifteen projects. ::::::each consumer has his place (number)in one of the projects and their sectors…. _____________________________________________________
P R O J E C T W O R K
----MOTIVATION : A LOT OF PEOPLE EXPERIENCE THEIR WORK AS BORING BECAUSE THE TOTALLY FREE MARKET DOES NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH WELLPAYED JOBS FOR THEM.
HAVING A JOB STILL IS NOT A RIGHT FOR EVERYBODY. WORKING-PEOPLE CANNOT CHANGE EASILY TO A NEW JOB BECAUSE OF THE SCARCITY OF JOBS.
IN A NEW INTERNATIONALLY ORGANIZED AND STANDARDIZED ECONOMY, COMPETIVITY WILL NOT BE BASED ON EXPLOITATION ANY MORE, BECAUSE ALL PRICES AND PRODUCTION CONDITIONS WILL BE STANDARDIZED.
THE HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATIONS OF FIRMS AND INSTITUTIONS
MUST WORK WITH TOO MUCH DIFFERENT BUREAUCRATIC REGLEMENTS AND STATUTES.
THERE IS A LOT OF WORK AHEAD IF WE WANT TO STANDARDIZE THESE TOOLS IN OUR COMPAGNIES ,WHILE WE WILL START WORKING ON ADMINISTRATIVE UNIFICATION.
-----DEMANDS : PEOPLE WORKING IN HUMAN RESOURCES SHOULD CREATE INTERNATIONAL DATA TO WORK WITH , on the folowing bases :
° SAME WORK SAME PAY ° LESS DIFFERENCE IN PAY ( 1/2 maximum difference)
°INDIVIDUAL PREMIUM OR INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION SHOULD BE WELL
ORGANISED ON AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE MEASURABLE OBJECTIV RESULTS
°PEOPLE WHO STUDY SHOULD HAVE AN INCOME
°EVERYBODY SHOULD BE ABLE TO WORK WITHIN REASONABLE DISTANCE OF HIS WORK
project t e l e m a t i c s
----MOTIVATION : THERE IS T MUCH ANARCHY IN THE USE OF THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS
IN TELEMATICS , THE REAL POSSIBILITIES ARE COMMERCIALIZED.
-------DEMANDS : ° CREATION OF A TELEMATIC UNIVERSAL MANAGMENT SYSTEM (T.U.M.S.)
A SYSTEM TO BE USED IN EVERYTHING THAT HAS TO DO WITH ORGANISATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE MANAGMENT OF THE PROJECTS AND THEIR SECTORS...
IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO CONTROLE AND COORDINATE, each GOUVERNEMENT AND EACH
MANAGMENT SHOULD USE THE SAME TUMS-system…to know about how many people ? where ?
Who ? what ? how much ? when ?…
° TUMS SHOULD BECOME A PROJECT TO INTEGRATE THE 15 PROJECTS
AND MANAGE THE SUPERSTRUCTURE OF MODERN AND FUTURE TELEMATICS.
IN ORDER TO DO SO COMPANIES DEALING WITH HARD& SOFTWARE SHOULD UNITE TO CONSTRUCT ONE standardizedTUMS-plan, in stead of purchasing silly competition games.
°massproduction of a MULTIFUNCTIONAL TELETERMINAL
project t r a n s p o r t
------MOTIVATION : TO STOP POLLUTION SINCERELY SOMETHING DRASTIC MUST BE DONE
____DEMANDS : ° FREE PUBLIC TRANSPORT mainly in the cities (payed by small equal contrib.)
project s e c u r i t y
-----MOTIVATION : CRIMERATES , traffic AND WARS ARE KILLING AND SICKENING
----DEMANDS : °MORE SOCIAL JUSTICE IS LESS CRIME AND WAR
°RECONVERSION OF WAR-ECONOMY
°ARMIES SHOULD INTERNATIONALLY BE USED AS FORCES THAT HELP
WITH NATURE-DISASTERS, BUILDING DIKES,,. helping fire -departement…
°CREATION OF ONE POLICE FORCE FOR EACH KIND OF CRIME.(one data)
°INTERNATIONALLY CONTROLED DESTRUCTION OF WEAPONS for war
°TRAFFIC POLICE COULD USE SOME HELP WHEN THERE IS NO MORE 'work'
IN THE ARMY
project p r o d u c t i o n
-----MOTIVATION : INSTEAD OF MOVING TOWARDS COOPERATION THERE ARE WARS GOING
ON BETWEEN COMPANIES: THE VICTIMS ARE THE DISMISSED AND THE
PEOPLE AND FAMILIES WITH TOO MUCH STRESS
____DEMANDS : °MANAGERS SHOULD CREATE WORLDWIDE FILES CONCERNING
PRODUCTION/ STOCKAGE/PRODUCERS/ PRICES/DISTRIBUTION/
TRANSPORT…for each single product or raw material
°IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO DO SO THEY SHOULD UNITE
ORGANISATIONALLY IN FUNCTION OF THE PRODUCT THEY MAKE
°NO MORE WASTE-ECONOMY :replacing and saving paper, wood…
project d i s t r i b u t i o n
-----MOTIVATION : different prices kill jobs alsO
___DEMANDS : °SAME PRICES WORLDWIDE MORE JOBS IN BIG STORES
°EQUAL PRICES FOR SERVICES __FREE PROFESSIONS…
project h o u s i n g
-----MOTIVATION : MILLIONS LIVE IN TERRIBLE HOUSING -CONDITIONS OR PAY TO
°INVENTARISATION OF HOUSES/ NEEDED HOUSES/ HOUSES TO BE REPAIRED/
HOUSES TO BE BUILD/ …in order to be able to do so once again all kinds of firms dealing with housing
, renting, building…should be obliged to join their information if they don't discover the benefits earlier.
°STOP SPECULATION …why not a law that says that if you own more then one house you are obliged to sell it, in stead of renting it…why not then consider the rent as a pay of on long term ?
°MORE NATURE IN THE CITIES (for example farms for children…)
°ONE INTERNATIONAL RENTING PRICE
project h e a l t h
---MOTIVATION : THE HEALTH OF SOME ANIMALS SEEMS TO BE MORE IMPORTANT THEN THE HEALTH OF MILIONS OF PEOPLE WHILE THE WEST TAKES TOO MANY DRUGGS INSTEAD OF EXAMENING THE INFLUENCE OF STRESS AT WORK OR THE INNER AND OUTER RELATIONSHIPS OF THE HUMAN BEING AND ALL HIS SUBJECTIVE NEEDS.
---DEMANDS : °BETTER NOURISHMENT /HEALTH CARE IN THE THIRD WORLD
°More natural forms of healing, less anti-biotics…
°One equal anual contribution to pay for health-service (no more bureaucracy of 'getting your
°Birth Control Program
project f o o d
---MOTIVATION : THE OLD SYSTEM INVENTS LAWS TO THROW FOOD AWAY AND TO FORBID PRODUCTION WHILE MILLIONS STARVE
__DEMANDS : °HELP- PROGRAMS FOR POOR FARMERS EVERYWHERE
(why not organised by the farmers and the tool-making industry here ?)
project e n v i r o n m e n t
----MOTIVATION : YOU KNOW WE WILL HAVE TO LIMITE POLLUTION…if not…
----DEMANDS : °RECYCLING STARTS WITH SORTING THE CARBAGE
°also look for measures in other projects (transport…)
°hundreds of other measures
project e d u c a t i o n
-----MOTIVATION : GOUVERNEMENTS CUT ON EDUCATION TO SAVE THEIR BUDGET
/TEACHING HISTORY , FILOSOPHY AND PSHYCHOLOGY FEW TEACHERS
ARE REALLY CAPABLE OF THESE DAYS
___DEMANDS °CLOSER LINKS BETWEEN PROFESSION ANSD SCHOOL
°LESS PUPILS IN THE CLASSES (not more then ten is a good start)
°LINKS BETWEEN THE PROJECTS WORK (human resources firms or human
resources parts of compagnies ) and THE PROJECT EDUCATION
and links also to the educational projects ( exams, …) in other projects
°A LOT OF ATTENTION SHOULD GO TO THE PROJECTS PRESS AND
CULTURE THAT COULD BE INTEGRATED UNDER THE PROJECT
EDUCATION (why not separate nets for each kind of film, for documentaries…)
Project e n e r g y
-----MOTIVATION : NOT ENOUGH EFFORTS ARE BEING MADE TO SAVE OR PRODUCE ENERGY
___DEMANDS °INVESTING IN ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF GAINING ELECTRICITY
°INVESTING IN EDUCATING IN SAVING
project m o n e y
---MOTIVATION : THE SPECULATIVE ASPECT OF MONEY MUST DISSAPEAR
_DEMANDS : °see PEOPLE's DATA(suppose…)
°SIMPLE CONTRIBUTION FOR INSURANCE
Project s o c i e t y (political managment)
MOTIVATION : WILL THE 'LAST ONES' BE THE FIRST ONES IN HISTORY ? THE WORLD WAS ALWAYS RULED BY THE ONES WHO HELD THE ECONOMICAL POWER… IT WERE ALWAYS THE POWER-ATTEMPTS OF THE LAWER CLASSES THAT PUSHED history IN NEW DIRECTIONS : the ones who owned the land, the money, the means of production decided and still decide most of the time. DECISSIONS ON WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO HAVE A JOB OR ABOUT HUNGER AND WARSPENDING AND ENVIRONMENT SHOULDN' T BE TAKEN IN FUNCTION OF SPECULATION. TO MANNY PARTYMEMBERS OBEY THE money -minded SPECULATORS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THEIR PARTY. UNION MEN MAINLY FIGHT FOR PARTIAL PROBLEMS AND AREN' T encouraged TO LOOK FOR GLOBAL SOLUTIONS AND ACTION…if they start doing so they are mostly thrown out anyway . Only somethimes people really show that they aren't afraid of change. Only some small groups try to organise those uprises…but they do not a collective alternative to manage society in an other way . Even if they have the same ideology, they stay divided because each group understands the historical background and future developments or the role from this or that group in society otherwise. IF THIS INTRESTS YOU …LET US KNOW.
° ALL THE DEMANDS IN 'PEOPLE' S DATA' and THE DEMANDS OF THE PROJECTS AND A
WORLD -WIDE REFERENDUM ON THIS, starting behind our pc's, in our pubs , reunions, companies…
°IF ALL THIS CANNOT FIND HIS EXPRESSION IN THE CLASSICAL DEMOCRACY WE ENHERITED FROM HISTORY AND WHO TRIES TO DIVIDE US IN SO MANY WAYS,
THIS MEANS IF POLITICIANS DO NOT LISTEN TO NECESSITIES THAT WILL IMPLEMENT
THEMSELVES ANY HOW…THEY WILL LOOSE THEIR JOB FOR A CHANGE.
°WHY COULD't WE REPLACE THE OLD SYSTEM OF ELECTIONS BY A NEW ONE ?
Candidates for the local managment functions could present themselves on the lists of the projects, not on the list of the parties , except the list of the project 'society', where one still would be able to vote for the ones having to manage jurisdiction, adminstration of the population, notarial things (since politicians mainly are lawyers they would find themselves at home.
PROJECT-ELECTIONS WOULD REPLACE PARTY-ELECTIONS MOSTLY , and THE ONES ELECTED PROVINCIALLY COULD ELECT THE CONTINENTAL
GOVERNEMENT, who AT THE SAME TIME WOULD BE THE WORLD -GOVERNEMENT.
The local counsels should be attended by the controling committees from neighbourhood or compagnie.
But before we can have all this we must simply start with discussion- groups.
New ways of protesting will emerge and are emerging.
Project r e l a t i o n s
__MOTIVATION : THERE ARE A LOT OF OBJECTIVE RELATIONSHIPS AS WE CAN EXPERIENCE THEM IN ONE OF THE MENTIONED PROJECTS OF SOCIETY.
THOSE OBJECTIVE RELATIONSHIPS EVOLUATE IN A COLLECTIVE WAY JUST LIKE EACH HUMAN BEIING CAN EVOLUATE IN A PERSONAL WAY OF DEALING WITH THE SUBJECTIVE THINGS IN LIFE : AM I A NIHILISTE OR SOMEBODY WHO LIKES PHILOSOPHY , SCIENCE…, am I emotionally strong enough to have a good influence on those who surround me, however contradictory this good influence at first sight may seem ?
IN MANY CASES THE BEHAVIOUR and thought OF MEN REFLECTS THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE RULING CLASS . MUCH IN RELIGION AND SURELY IN NATIONALISM STILL PREFENDS US FROM GETTING CLOSER TO OUR COMMON ROOTS. WHY too much SPECULATE ABOUT LIFE AFTER DEAD, WHILE THERE ARE ENOUGH TASKS TO BE FOUND HERE .
Discovering why your life was and is and will be your life is much more interesting. ..it 's a rather personal voyage to wisdom. ANYWAY SCIENCE ALREADY PROVED ELECTRONS HAVE AN ETERNAL EXISTENCE…and because everything exists of electrons we will return to the elements we came from : the ever recomposing elements to be found in the earth, wind, light and fire…maybe even in the anti-matter …who nows ? All the elements together formed our spirit, that's for sure .
°LEARN TO COMMUNICATE WITH YOURSELF AND OTHERS
°LEARN TO READ AND WRITE AND DISTINGUISH THE POSITIVE FROM THE NEGATIVE EVEN IF THE NEGATIVE SOMETIMES CONTRIBUTES TO THE POSITIVE, the positive must lead.
°LEARN TO OBSERVE IN A VERY BALANCED WAY WHAT IS HAPPENING IN YOUR TOTAL EVIRONMENT.
°LEARN TO DEAL WITH NEGATIVE EMOTIONS
°LEARN TO ALWAYS KEEP ON WONDERING ABOUT THINGS AND PEOPLE LIKE YOU KEEP ON WONDERING ABOUT SOMEBODY YOU LOVE …everything and everybody can teach you how to make better choises…how to maintain your good vibrations better.
°LEARN TO TRUST ON THE POWER IN YOU AND TO SOMETIMES HELP OTHERS ONLY BY TRUSTING ON THEIR INNER ENERGY, not by doing something they ought to do..
°LEARN TO BE AND TALK HONNEST, also in it's sometimes strange ways
LA LUTTE FINALE SE PREPARE CHAQUE JOUR...
future modèle de gestion de société
On doit restructurer la politique. C.O.N.S.C.I.E.N.S.C.E., le COmité pour des Nouveaux Elections Simultanés Nécessaire pour créer plus d'Egalité...vous propose de voter son :
Supposez l'argent serait quelque chose pour nous aider à calculer au lieu de spéculer...alors certains peintures ne seraient pas si chèr que construire des maisons pour des centaines de gens.
Supposez que chaque Etat et compagnie sur une échelle mondiale payerait le même salaire pour le même travail, une quantité qui offrait d'une façon écologique la possibilité à avoir une vie humaine.
Supposez que les enseigneurs mondiale pouvaient avir des classes de seulement dix personnes.
Supposez que tous les matériaux et services avaient une prix unique, exprimé dans une monnaie mondial. Supposez que l'administration de chacun et chaque firme serait traité d'une même façon : chacun un numéro de téléphone, élargit avec trois lettres qui donnent connection avec chaque des 15 projets de la société : NOUriture/MAIson/TRAvail/SECurité/EDUcation/ENErgy/PROduction/DIStribution/TRAnsport/
Supposez que chaque service publique est payé par une contibution égale de tout le monde(pris une fois par mois de notre salaire avant qu'on le touche) Un tel système un accès presque gratuit aux transports et télécommunication. Ce système pouvait être élargit à d'autres secteurs(produits et autres services) pourvu il existerait une maturité sociale très large.
Supposez qu'on nous organiserait et qu'on mettait notre collective à un aprouvenment internationale, avant qu'on organiserait le second tour de ses nouveaux éléctions pour élire les dirigents local, provincial , continental et mondiale des différents projets.
Supposez que la qualité de la vie deviendrait plus important que beaucoup de bureaucratie et de stupidité commerciale.
Supposez que qu'ondevenait conscient du fait que l'histoire nous pousse vers l'organisation d'un meilleur monde sans chomage, pauvreté, guerre, pollution...
Pour chacun des projets on va donner d'abor un peu de motivation et après on va posser nos demandes. Il faudra aussi déveloper un 'site' pour voter sur l'internet.
C.ON.S.I.E.N.C.E presente : les 15 projets
-motivation : beaucoup de gens trouvent leur boulot ennuyante parce que la marché libre ne donne pas asseze du travail/avoir du travail n'est pas encore un droit/on peut pas façillement changer son travail, parce qu'il y en a pas assez/ Dans un économy standardisé, le compétivité ne sera pas basé sur l'exploitation puisque les conditions seront les même pour tous. Les Resources Humaines, les administrations personnels travaillent encore avec trop de différents statuts et réglements. Il faudrait les simplifier et standardiser.
-demandes : LE DROIT SUR UN EMPLOI AVEC UN SENS/MEME TRAVAIL MEME SALAIRE/LES ETUDIANTS DOIVENT ETRE PAYE AUSSI/
-motivatie : pour l'administration des projects les moyens technologique ne sont pas standardisés, l'internet est trop utilisés uniquement pour des raisons commerciales
-demandes : la création d'un Système Universel Telematique pour le Gestion des projects (TUMS)un système pour l'administration et organisation des projects. Pour coordiner et controler chaque gouvernemt et entreprise devait empoyer le même système.pour savoir qui veut quelle emploie et quoi et où, pour savoir le demande de tous les produits et services. La population pourrait mondiale suivre ces données. TUMS serait le project pour intégrer les 15 projects et le pour gerer le secteur telecom.
Une campagne d'alfabetisations devrait être organisée pour tout le monde.
-motovation :pour mettre fin à la polution, le transport publique doit devenir principale
-demandes : une petite taxe standardisé ferait le transport publique presque gratuit
-motivation : il y aurait moins de crime parce que tot le monde aura une emploie/ mettre un fin aux guerres
-demandes : abolition des guerres/ reconversion de l'industrie d'armement/les armées vont être utilisés pour aider en cas de désastres naturelles, grands tavaux publiques pour empecher ses désastres/
seulement la police a le droit de porter des armes
-motivation : au lieu de colaborer, il ya de guerres entres les entreprises, les victimes en sont les chomeurs, les accidents de travails et les individus et familles avec trop de stress
-demandes : les gérants devraient utiliser le système TUMS pour rendre l'information de leur entreprises accesible pour tot le monde : stockage, prix, demandes de personnels... . Les producents devrraient se réunir par group de product. Des messures pour éviter le gaspilage et la pollution devraient être pris.
-motivation : trop de spéculation
-demandes : même prix pour même produits ou service/ création des données télématique pour savoir ou se trouvent quels produits et lequel et le moyen de transports le plus éfficient
-motivation : des millions vivent dans des conditions inhumaines ou payent trop de loyer
-demandes : inventarisation des maisons nécessaires, à reparer, construire.../tarifs sociales, pas de spéculation
-motivation : le vieux système invente des lois pour détruire la nouriture pour des raisons spéculatives et promote parfois ne pas producer la nouriture
-demandes : de la nouriture pour tout le monde en unifiant tous les efforts d'agriculture sur une échelle mondiale/ tous ceux qui travaillent dans ce secteur doivent recevoir une salaire uniforme s'ils travaillent leur terrains bien
-motivation : reduire la pollution
-demandes : pas de surconsumation/triage immondices/recyclage/transport publique/entretiens des parcs nature/lois pour protéger les annimaux/plus d'energie propre...
-motivation : ne pas épargner sur l'enseignement, les pays pauvres doivent avoir des conditions commes
dans les autres pays pour enseigner
-demandes : pas trop d'élèves dans une classe/plus d'attention aus sciences humaines : philosophie, histoire, psychologie.../plus d'échangement entre entreprises et l'enseignement/enseignement pour adultes aussi/enseignement doit aussi apprendre à interpreter les medias objectivement
-motivation : trop de gaspilage et pollution
-demandes : invester dans l'energie propre
-motivation : l'aspect spéculative a des conséquences désastreuse dans le monde
-demandes : uniquement utilisation administrative de l'argent/une monnaie mondiale avec la même valeur partout/les banques doivent s'unir
project gestion de la société
-motivation : les décisions sur qui a le droit de travailler ou guerre ou pas de guerre...sont toujours pris par l'élite politique. Les dirigents politique ne peuvent pas faire une politique qui va contre le program globale. Ceux qui prennent les décisions dans les parties politiques et les syndicats suivent toujours ce que les spéculants veulent . On tourne dans des petits rond au lieu de résoudre les problèmes sur d'une façon mondiale. Si on va suivre leur logique, cela voudrait dire qu'on dois tous aller travailler pour le salaire le plus bas du monde...leur capitalisme éfondrait vite alors. Ils existent des groupes qui veulent prendre une autre chemin, mais ils sont divisé sur l'interpétation de l'histoire et sur les tactiques à suivre et ils bordurent uniquement sur le bataille classique des syndicats : des bon salaires sans connection mondiale et alternative globale
-demandes : tous les demandes des autres projects/ organisation des éléctions alternatives sur internets ou pression des comités sur les gouvernements nationaux ou administrations communales ou syndicats/
propagande poutr un nouveau système d'éléctions internationale: d'abord pour une programme mondiale et après pour les dirigents. Pour neutraliser le boycot des grands speculateurs il y aura pas des nationalisations. Sur le project 'gestion de la société' on pourra elire les dirigents por la justice, pour l'administration de la population et le premier qui aura une fonction coordinative. Un jour les éléctions des dirigents de projects remplaceraient les élections classique et par project et province quelqu'n sera envoyé au gouvernement continentale. Le gouvernement continentale formerais le gouvernement mondiale. Principe de base pour organiser ces éléctions serait le nombre de habitants d'un province.
Les comités locale pourraient avoir des moyens de controle sur leurs communes et entreprises.
-motivation : on devrais apprendre à travailler sans la discipline qui impose le système ancien et on devait de plus près avoir un intérets pour les problèmes de le monde de nos jours
-demandes : accompagnement psychologique pour des problèmes subjectives entre les gens/
des medias objectives et indépendentes du capital spéculative
-motivation : de nos jours on utilise trop de médicaments, c'est mieux d'attaquer les sources des maladies comme la pollution, le stress, la culture commerciale, pas assez de contact avec la nature, tensions psycholgiques
-demandes : nouriture naturelle de bon qualité, établissement d'un infrastructure médicale dans les pays pauvres, des soins médicale pour tout le monde (petite contribution de tout le monde)
Si la volonté et la nécessite pour discuter l'alternative collectiviste devient plus claire on peut commencer à inventer des actions. Organiser de la pression sur les mandataires politiques classique,
des arrêts de travails pour discuter l'alternative. Exiger du patronat qu'il paye les mêmes salaires dans les pays pauvres... . Des manifestations pour exiger des Nations Unis l'abolition des guerres et de la pauvreté en imposant les demandes de l'alternative collective. Tous les premiers des différents gouvernements doivent avoir un réunion pour aux moins interdire toute spéculation dans l'économie, même salaire pour le même travail, reconversion de l'industrie militaire, etc... .
- the 12 commandments
develop the stronger part in yourself
search for objective knowledge
overcome your negative emotions
do your part of the work
take the time for silence and nature
money was a means of, not a purpose
discover the true meaning of faith and faithfulness
don’t life only for working for money
too much consumption spoils yourself
discover the symbolism of the meaning of life
life brings you closer to the hart of life : separating sense from nonsense